HR ambidexterity and absorptive capacities: A paradox-based approach to HRM capabilities and practice adoption in MNC subsidiaries

被引:15
作者
Beletskiy, Anton [1 ]
Fey, Carl F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanken Sch Econ, Dept Management & Org, Arkadiankatu 22, Helsinki 00101, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Business, Dept Management Studies, Espoo, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
international HRM; knowledge transfer; strategic HR; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; MULTINATIONAL-CORPORATIONS; PERSONNEL MANAGERS; FUTURE-DIRECTIONS; METHOD VARIANCE; MEDIATING ROLE; INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/hrm.22039
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article examines the relationship between the capabilities of HR departments and the level of adoption of corporate HRM practices in MNC subsidiaries. To explain this relationship, we leverage paradox theorizing, still rare but gaining increasing attention in HRM research, and integrate the studies of practice transfer, organizational ambidexterity, and absorptive capacity. First, we establish the conceptual linkages between the implementation and internalization dimensions of practice adoption and the potential and realized absorptive capacities of HR departments. Second, we re-define the operational and strategic activities of HR departments in terms of the learning paradox of exploitation and exploration. Third, we introduce the concept of HR ambidexterity to describe HR departments that possess high levels of capabilities in both operational (exploitative) and strategic (explorative) task-domains. Finally, we hypothesize that ambidextrous HR departments are more adept at adopting corporate HRM practices. An analysis of the survey data from 105 foreign subsidiaries of 12 MNCs supports this single hypothesis. The main contribution of this research is in leveraging paradox theorizing to explain the nature of HRM capabilities and their role in the adoption of HRM practices.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 883
页数:21
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]   Endogeneity: How Failure to Correct for it can Cause Wrong Inferences and Some Remedies [J].
Abdallah, Wissam ;
Goergen, Marc ;
O'Sullivan, Noel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 26 (04) :791-804
[2]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[3]   Aligning corporate transfer intentions and subsidiary HRM practice implementation in multinational corporations [J].
Ahlvik, Catarina ;
Smale, Adam ;
Sumelius, Jennie .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2016, 51 (03) :343-355
[4]   Towards explaining subsidiary implementation, integration, and internalization of MNC headquarters HRM practices [J].
Ahlvik, Catarina ;
Bjorkman, Ingmar .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2015, 24 (03) :497-505
[5]   Cultural practices and values at the societal level in Estonia in comparison with neighbouring countries [J].
Alas, Ruth ;
Tuulik, Krista .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 8 (01) :39-44
[6]   ESTABLISHING HR PROFESSIONALS' INFLUENCE AND CREDIBILITY: LESSONS FROM THE CAPITAL MARKETS AND INVESTMENT BANKING SECTOR [J].
Aldrich, Paul ;
Dietz, Graham ;
Clark, Timothy ;
Hamilton, Peter .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 54 (01) :105-130
[7]   STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[8]  
Andersen Torben J., 2017, RESPONSIVE GLOBAL OR, P13, DOI DOI 10.1108/978-1-78714-831-420171001
[9]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[10]   How are Practices Made to Vary? Managing Practice Adaptation in a Multinational Corporation [J].
Ansari, Shahzad ;
Reinecke, Juliane ;
Spaan, Amy .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2014, 35 (09) :1313-1341