Validation of a predictive model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section

被引:8
作者
Enrique Fonseca, Javier [1 ,2 ]
Lucia Rodriguez, Juliana [1 ]
Maya Salazar, Durley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valle, Fac Salud, Escuela Med, Cali, Colombia
[2] Hosp Univ Valle Evaristo Garcia, Cali, Colombia
来源
COLOMBIA MEDICA | 2019年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
Vaginal birth after cesarean; cohort study; validation study; repeat cesarean section; obstetric delivery; trial of labor; labor presentation; cervical dilatation; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.25100/cm.v50i1.2521
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: A strategy for reducing the number of cesarean sections is to allow vaginal delivery after cesarean section. Objective: To validate two predictive models, Metz and Grobman, for successful vaginal delivery after a cesarean section. Methods: Retrospective cohort study involving women with previous history of a previous segmental cesarean section, single pregnancy >= 37 weeks and cephalic presentation. The proportion of vaginal delivery in all pregnant women was determined, and it was compared with those (women) with successful delivery after cesarean section. Then, there were elaborated the models, and their predictive capacity was determined by curve-receiver-operator. Results: The proportion of successful delivery in pregnant women with a previous cesarean section and indication of vaginal delivery was 85.64%. The observed proportion of birth for each decile predicted in the Grobman model was less than 15%, except for the 91-100% decile, where it was 64.09%; the area under the curve was 0.95. For the Metz model, the actual successful delivery rate was lower than predicted in scores between 4 and 14, and within expected for a score between 15 and 23; the area under the curve was 0.94. Conclusions: The vaginal delivery rate after cesarean was lower than expected according to the predictive models of Grobman and Metz. The implementation of these models in a prospective way can lead to a higher rate of successful birth.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, LANCET, V2, P436
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V52, P90, DOI [10.1016/s0020-7292(96)90009-0, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7292(96)90009-0, 10.1016/S0020-7292(96)90009-0]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OBSTET GYNECOL, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002534
[4]   Indications Contributing to the Increasing Cesarean Delivery Rate [J].
Barber, Emma L. ;
Lundsberg, Lisbet S. ;
Belanger, Kathleen ;
Pettker, Christian M. ;
Funai, Edmund F. ;
Illuzzi, Jessica L. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (01) :29-38
[5]   Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery? [J].
Cahill, Alison G. ;
Stamilio, David M. ;
Odibo, Anthony O. ;
Peipert, Jeffrey F. ;
Ratcliffe, Sarah J. ;
Stevens, Erika J. ;
Sammel, Mary D. ;
Macones, George A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (04) :1143-1147
[6]   Validation of a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Caesarean [J].
Chaillet, Nils ;
Bujold, Emmanuel ;
Dube, Eric ;
Grobman, William A. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2013, 35 (02) :119-124
[7]  
Consenso de la Federacion Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia (Fecolsog) y la Federacion Colombiana de Perinatologia (Fecopen), 2014, REV COLOMB OBSTET GI, V65, P139
[8]   Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery [J].
Costantine, Maged M. ;
Fox, Karin ;
Byers, Benjamin D. ;
Mateus, Julio ;
Ghulmiyyah, Labib M. ;
Blackwell, Sean ;
Hankins, Gary D. V. ;
Grobman, William A. ;
Saade, George .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (05) :1029-1033
[9]   Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study [J].
Cox, Kim J. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2011, 11
[10]  
Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadistica (DANE), 2017, NAC TIP PART SEG DEP