Socioeconomic and Clinical Factors Influence the Interval Between Positive Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy

被引:18
|
作者
Pitman, Max [1 ]
Korets, Ruslan [1 ]
Kates, Max [1 ]
Hruby, Gregory W. [1 ]
McKiernan, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
RACIAL-DIFFERENCES; CANCER-PATIENTS; EQUAL-ACCESS; LOW-INCOME; OUTCOMES; MEN; RISK; POPULATION; MARRIAGE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2012.01.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To examine socioeconomic and clinical factors that may predict a longer interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS The Columbia University Urologic Oncology Database was queried for patients who underwent RP from 1990-2010. Time to surgery (TTS) was defined as the period between the most recent positive prostate biopsy and date of surgery. Clinical factors examined included: age, D'Amico risk group, year of surgery, body mass index, and comorbidities. Socioeconomic factors included race/ethnicity, relationship status, income, and distance to treatment center. The relationship between clinical/socioeconomic factors and TTS was evaluated using univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS Two-thousand five-hundred seventy-three patients were included in the analysis. Median TTS was 48 days (IQR 35-70, range 43-1103), and 71% of patients underwent RP within 60 days after the most recent positive biopsy. On multivariate analysis, living further from the medical center was associated with shorter TTS (P = .01), whereas more recent year of surgery (P = .01), comorbid cardiovascular disease (P = .007), African-American (P = .005) or Hispanic race (P = .005), divorced relationship status (P = .01), and lower income (P = .003) were all associated with longer TTS. CONCLUSION Patients often experience widely variable intervals between the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer. Longer intervals before surgery may point to disparities in access to prostate cancer care, and not increased decision-making time by the patient. UROLOGY 80: 1027-1032, 2012. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1032
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] No clinical significance of the time interval between biopsy and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer on biochemical recurrence: a propensity score matching analysis
    Hirasawa, Yosuke
    Ohori, Makoto
    Sugihara, Toru
    Hashimoto, Takeshi
    Satake, Naoya
    Gondo, Tatsuo
    Nakagami, Yoshihiro
    Namiki, Kazunori
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    Nakashima, Jun
    Tachibana, Masaaki
    Ohno, Yoshio
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 47 (11) : 1083 - 1089
  • [2] A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Koie, Takuya
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Arai, Yoichi
    Ohyama, Chikara
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 49 (02) : 103 - 107
  • [3] The presence of chronic inflammation in positive prostate biopsy is associated with upgrading in radical prostatectomy
    Guner, Ekrem
    Danacioglu, Yavuz Onur
    Arikan, Yusuf
    Seker, Kamil Gokhan
    Polat, Salih
    Baytekin, Halil Firat
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 93 (03) : 280 - 284
  • [4] Influence of the time interval between biopsy and surgery on the biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients
    Hikita, Katsuya
    Honda, Masashi
    Shimizu, Ryutaro
    Teraoka, Shogo
    Kimura, Yuske
    Yumioka, Tetsuya
    Tsounapi, Panagiota
    Iwamoto, Hideto
    Morizane, Shuichi
    Takenaka, Atsushi
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (11) : 2179 - 2184
  • [5] Influence of Obesity on Gleason Score Inconsistencies between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Sahin, Aytac
    Urkmez, Ahmet
    Yuksel, Ozgur Haki
    Verit, Ayhan
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2018, 28 (07): : 541 - 545
  • [6] Perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsy: Prognostic value on radical prostatectomy and active surveillance
    Ramos, Nuno
    Macedo, Alexandre
    Rosa, Joao
    Carvalho, Miguel
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2020, 92 (04) : 330 - 334
  • [7] Influence of obesity on localized prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy
    Qu, Yuan-Yuan
    Dai, Bo
    Kong, Yun-Yi
    Chang, Kun
    Ye, Ding-Wei
    Yao, Xu-Dong
    Zhang, Shi-Lin
    Zhang, Hai-Liang
    Yang, Wei-Yi
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (06) : 747 - 752
  • [8] Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jie
    Jiang, Qing
    Li, Qiubo
    Zhang, Yuanfeng
    Gao, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 52 (04) : 619 - 631
  • [9] Does the delay from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy influence the risk of biochemical recurrence?
    Meunier, M. E.
    Neuzillet, Y.
    Radulescu, C.
    Cherbonnier, C.
    Herve, J-M
    Rouanne, M.
    Molinie, V
    Lebret, T.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2018, 28 (10): : 475 - 481
  • [10] Over half of contemporary clinical Gleason 8 on prostate biopsy are downgraded at radical prostatectomy
    Qi, Robert
    Foo, Wen-chi
    Ferrandino, Michael N.
    Davis, Leah G.
    Sekar, Sitharthan
    Longo, Thomas A.
    Jibara, Ghalib
    Han, Tracy
    Gokhan, Ilhan.
    Moul, Judd W.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 8982 - 8989