China's new rural "separating three property rights" land reform results in grassland degradation: Evidence from Inner Mongolia

被引:94
作者
Li, Ang [1 ]
Wu, Jianguo [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Xueyao [1 ,4 ]
Xue, Jianguo [1 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [2 ]
Han, Xingguo [1 ]
Huang, Jianhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Bot, State Key Lab Vegetat & Environm Change, Beijing 100093, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, CHESS, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19A Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Payment for ecosystem services; Grassland rental; Grassland degradation; Ecosystem services; Cooperative; Rangeland ecology; LITTER DECOMPOSITION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOIL CARBON; MANAGEMENT; SEQUESTRATION; INSTITUTIONS; ADAPTATION; POLICIES; IMPACTS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China is currently implementing the "separating three property rights" (STPR) reform to consolidate rural land. This reform divides rural land property rights into three components: nontradable ownership, nontradable contractual rights and tradable land use rights. The STPR reform adopts the rental of grassland use rights, a market-oriented approach, as the main arrangement for grassland consolidation. However, this arrangement may undermine the cornerstones of grassland restoration, which are the security of grassland property and payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies. As an alternative to the market-oriented approach, cooperatives are also encouraged to consolidate grassland use rights. We used a natural experiment approach to systematically examine how two different land consolidation arrangements affected key grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia. In rented grasslands, all ecosystem services except provisioning services degenerated severely. Traded grassland use rights were perceived as insecure, which led to predatory land use by tenants. In contrast, cooperative-managed grasslands showed no serious degradation in ecosystem services. However, these cooperatives limited their group size by chief kinship to avoid the free-rider problem; thus, they are unlikely to become a primary channel of grassland consolidation. Because PES policy subsidies are still allocated to grassland contractors rather than to tenants, these policies are irrelevant to the conservation of rented grasslands. Based on our analysis, we suggest several ways to improve this new rural land property reform to avoid a major wave of grassland degradation in China.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 182
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[11]   Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues [J].
Engel, Stefanie ;
Pagiola, Stefano ;
Wunder, Sven .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (04) :663-674
[12]   Impacts of grazing abandonment on ecosystem service provision: Coastal grassland as a model system [J].
Ford, Hilary ;
Garbutt, Angus ;
Jones, Davey L. ;
Jones, Laurence .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 162 :108-115
[13]   Land tenure and agricultural management: Soil conservation on rented and owned fields in southwest British Columbia [J].
Fraser, EDG .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2004, 21 (01) :73-79
[14]   Rental markets for cultivated land and agricultural investments in China [J].
Gao, Liangliang ;
Huang, Jikun ;
Rozelle, Scott .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 43 (04) :391-403
[15]  
GMSC, 2016, NAT GRASSL MON REP 2
[16]   Market-based grazing land transfers and customary institutions in the management of rangelands: Two case studies on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J].
Gongbuzeren ;
Zhuang, Minghao ;
Li, Wenjun .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 57 :287-295
[17]   Effects of heterogeneous habitat use by cattle on nutrient availability and litter decomposition in soils of an Alpine pasture [J].
Güsewell, S ;
Jewell, PL ;
Edwards, PJ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2005, 268 (1-2) :135-149
[18]  
Han C. F., 2016, GUANGMING DAILY
[19]  
Han J., 2011, SURVEY ECOLOGICAL IS
[20]  
Hanna S., 1995, Property rights and the environment: social and ecological issues., P15