GTL or LNG: Which is the best way to monetize "stranded" natural gas?

被引:29
作者
Dong Lichun [1 ]
Wei Shun'an [1 ]
Tan Shiyu [1 ]
Zhang Hongjing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
关键词
GTL (gas to liquids); LNG (liquefied natural gas); stranded" natural gas;
D O I
10.1007/s12182-008-0063-8
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A large portion of world's natural gas reserves are "stranded" resources, the drive to monetize these resources leads to the development of gas-to-liquids (GTL) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) technologies. LNG has the advantage of having been developed for the past 40 years and having an excellent safety record. GTL on the other hand is another option with substantial benefits, but its development stage and commercial viability are far behind LNG. This paper presents a techno-economic comparison of GTL with LNG, including technical development, plant efficiency, market potential for the products, and capital cost for the infrastructure. The aim is to give an overall view on both LNG and GTL and provide a perspective on the profitability of these two technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 394
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Int. Pet. Econ
[2]  
ANTARI A, 2002, 17 WORLD PETR C RIO
[3]   Update on synthesis gas production for GTL [J].
Bakkerud, PK .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 2005, 106 (1-4) :30-33
[4]  
CHEN Z, 2003, PETROL PROCESS, V34, P1
[5]  
Fleisch T. H., 2002, J NAT GAS CHEM, V11, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-6701(03)91770-X
[6]  
HAN D, 2006, CHEM TECHNOLOGY MARK, V29, P27
[7]  
Heng HC, 2004, J NAT GAS CHEM, V13, P63
[8]  
HU J, 2006, NATURAL GAS CHEM TEC
[9]  
KASHAV TS, 2007, FUEL PROCESSING TECH, V88, P493
[10]  
Patel B, 2005, 7 WORLD C CHEM ENG G