Diagnostic performance of quantitative Ga-SPECT/CT for patients with lower-limb osteomyelitis

被引:3
作者
Nishikawa, Yoshito [1 ]
Fukushima, Yoshimitsu [1 ]
Kirinoki, Sonoko [2 ]
Takagi, Gen [2 ]
Suda, Masaya [1 ]
Maki, Toshio [1 ]
Kumita, Shinichiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Radiol, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkydo ku, Tokyo 1138603, Japan
[2] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokyo, Japan
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HYBRID IMAGING | 2022年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
SPECT/CT; Quantitative analysis; Osteomyelitis; Diagnostic performance; Prognostic value; SOFT-TISSUE INFECTION; DIABETIC FOOT; GA-67; MRI; SCINTIGRAPHY; ASSOCIATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s41824-022-00148-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Patients with lower-limb osteomyelitis (LLOM) may experience major adverse events, such as lower-leg amputations or death; therefore, early diagnosis and risk stratification are essential to improve outcomes. Ga-scintigraphy is commonly used for diagnosing inflammatory diseases. Although the diagnostic performance of planar and SPECT imaging for localized lesions is limited, SPECT/CT, which simultaneously acquires functional and anatomical definition, has resulted in significant improvements to diagnostic confidence. While quantitative Ga-SPECT/CT is an emerging approach to improve diagnoses, its diagnostic performance has not been sufficiently evaluated to date. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Ga-SPECT/CT with quantitative analyses for patients with LLOM. Methods: A total of 103 consecutive patients suspected of LLOM between April 2012 and October 2016 were analyzed. All patients underwent Ga-scintigraphy with SPECT/CT imaging. Findings were assessed visually, with higher than background accumulation considered positive, and quantitatively, using Ga-SPECT/CT images to calculate the lesion-to-background ratio (LBR), the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and total lesion uptake (TLU). Diagnoses were confirmed using pathological examinations and patient outcomes, and diagnostic performances of planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT images were compared. To evaluate prognostic performance, all patients were observed for 5 years for occurrences of major adverse events (MAE), defined as recurrence of osteomyelitis, major leg amputation, or fatal event. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to evaluate outcome factors. Results: The overall diagnoses indicated that 54 out of 103 patients had LLOM. LBR, SUVmax, and TLU were significantly higher in patients with LLOM (12.23 vs. 1.00, 4.85 vs. 1.34, and 68.77 vs. 8.63, respectively; p < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 96% for SPECT/CT with LBR, 89% and 94% for SPECT/CT with SUVmax, and 91% and 92% for SPECT/CT with TLU, respectively. MAE occurred in 23 of 54 LLOM patients (43%). TLU was found to be an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.047). Conclusions: Ga-SPECT/CT using quantitative parameters, namely LBR and TLU, had better diagnostic and prognostic performances for patients with LLOM compared to conventional imaging. The results suggest that Ga-SPECT/CT is a good alternative for diagnosing LLOM in countries where FDG-PET/CT is not commonly available.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in Patients Without Signs of Soft Tissue Infection by Coupling Hybrid 67Ga SPECT/CT With Bedside Percutaneous Bone Puncture
    Aslangul, Elisabeth
    M'Bemba, Jocelyne
    Caillat-Vigneron, Nadine
    Coignard, Sophie
    Larger, Etienne
    Boitard, Christian
    Lipsky, Benjamin A.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (08) : 2203 - 2210
  • [2] Bar-Shalom R, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P587
  • [3] ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, or Soft Tissue Infection (Excluding Spine and Diabetic Foot)
    Beaman, Francesca D.
    von Herrmann, Paul F.
    Kransdorf, Mark J.
    Adler, Ronald S.
    Amini, Behrang
    Appel, Marc
    Arnold, Erin
    Bernard, Stephanie A.
    Greenspan, Bennett S.
    Lee, Kenneth S.
    Tuite, Michael J.
    Walker, Eric A.
    Ward, Robert J.
    Wessell, Daniel E.
    Weissman, Barbara N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (05) : S326 - S337
  • [4] Becker W, 1999, Q J NUCL MED, V43, P9
  • [5] Diabetic foot osteomyetitis: a progress report on diagnosis and a systematic review of treatment
    Berendt, A. R.
    Peters, E. J. G.
    Bakker, K.
    Embil, J. M.
    Eneroth, M.
    Hinchliffe, R. J.
    Jeffcoate, W. J.
    Lipsky, B. A.
    Senneville, E.
    Teh, J.
    Valk, G. D.
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2008, 24 : S145 - S161
  • [6] 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan for monitoring the therapeutic response in experimental Staphylococcus aureus foreign-body osteomyelitis
    Chatziioannou, Sofia
    Papamichos, Odysseas
    Gamaletsou, Maria N.
    Georgakopoulos, Alexandros
    Kostomitsopoulos, Nikolaos G.
    Tseleni-Balafouta, Sofia
    Papaparaskevas, Joseph
    Walsh, Thomas J.
    Pneumaticos, Spiros G.
    Sipsas, Nikolaos V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [7] Comparison between Leukoscan® (Sulesomab) and Gallium-67 for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot
    Delcourt, A
    Huglo, D
    Prangere, T
    Benticha, H
    Devemy, F
    Tsirtsikoulou, D
    Lepeut, M
    Fontaine, P
    Steinling, M
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2005, 31 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [8] Department of Health and Aged Care, 2022, ALT POS EM TOM PET I
  • [9] Factors predictive of relapse in adult bacterial osteomyelitis of long bones.
    Garcia del Pozo, E.
    Collazos, J.
    Carton, J. A.
    Camporro, D.
    Asensi, V.
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 18
  • [10] Accuracy of diagnostic imaging modalities for peripheral post-traumatic osteomyelitis - a systematic review of the recent literature
    Govaert, Geertje A.
    IJpma, Frank F.
    McNally, Martin
    McNally, Eugene
    Reininga, Inge H.
    Glaudemans, Andor W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 (08) : 1393 - 1407