Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to "living with"

被引:166
作者
Turnhout, Esther [1 ]
Waterton, Claire [2 ]
Neves, Katja [3 ]
Buizer, Marleen [4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Forest & Nat Conservat Policy Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Lancaster, Dept Sociol, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
[3] Concordia Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Murdoch Univ, Sch Environm Sci, Ctr Excellence Climate Change Woodland & Forest H, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2013年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
Biodiversity; discourse; ecosystem services; global governance; IPBES; neoliberal conservation; science-policy interface; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SCIENCE; BIOLOGY; ECOLOGY; MOMENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00307.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Since the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, counting and mapping have come to dominate international debates around biodiversity protection. With the emergence of the Ecosystem Services concept, these counting and mapping efforts are increasingly imbued with an economic logic that argues that to save biodiversity, its goods and services must be given monetary value. This article offers a critical engagement with the Ecosystem Services discourse and the way it translates the diversity of nature into a single measurea currencyto be included in systems of exchange. We argue that this conception of biodiversity is too narrow and potentially detrimental because it reduces biodiversity to a series of quantifiable fragmented parts that become liable to counting, mapping, and utilitarian use, and because it reduces social-natural relations to market transactions. Subsequently, we outline possibilities for conceiving and living with biodiversity that go beyond relations of counting, mapping, and commodification. It is important that biodiversity knowledge organizations, such as the recently sanctioned Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), take these into account. Conserving a diversity of life requires acknowledging a diversity of values, knowledge and framings of biodiversity, and fostering a diversity of social-natural relations.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 161
页数:8
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] DISMANTLING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE
    AGRAWAL, A
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1995, 26 (03) : 413 - 439
  • [2] [Anonymous], CURRENT CONSERVATION
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Memory Practices in the Sciences
  • [4] [Anonymous], WHAT IS PROBL TAX IM
  • [5] [Anonymous], BARCODING N IN PRESS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 001NECR001 PAST COMM
  • [7] [Anonymous], REG ENV CHANGE
  • [8] [Anonymous], 044NERR044
  • [9] Appadurai Arjun., 1996, SOCIAL LIFE THINGS
  • [10] Berkes F., 2018, SACRED ECOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203928950