Acute offline transcranial direct current stimulation does not change pain or anxiety produced by the cold pressor test

被引:6
作者
Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P. [1 ]
Iannone, Aline [1 ]
Caixeta, Fabio Viegas [1 ]
Cavendish, Beatriz Araujo [2 ]
de Mello Cruz, Antonio Pedro [2 ]
Buratto, Luciano Grudtner [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brasilia, Inst Biol Sci, Dept Physiol Sci, Lab Neurosci & Behav, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] Univ Brasilia, Inst Psychol, Dept Basic Psychol Proc, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
tDCS; Pain; Cold pressor test; motor cortex; Prefrontal cortex; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MOTOR CORTEX; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; PERCEPTION; HEALTHY; TDCS; POLARIZATION; VARIABILITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135300
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has an antalgic effect on acute experimental pain in healthy volunteers. Many published studies have used online stimulation (i.e., tDCS performed during painful stimulation). On the other hand, daily tDCS sessions have been proposed as a therapy for chronic pain (offline tDCS). In such cases, the therapeutic potential depends on the possible aftereffects of each tDCS session. We set out to investigate whether a single tDCS session before application of a classical experimental pain paradigm (the Cold Pressor Test, CPT) would be capable of modulating physiological measures of anxiety as well as pain perception. tDCS was applied to 30 healthy volunteers, 18-28 years old (mean 18.5), with the anode positioned over either the left M1 or the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (1-DLPFC), which has been linked to the affective aspects of experienced pain, including anxiety. All volunteers underwent the CPT procedure before and after a tDCS session. Real 2 mA tDCS sessions for 20 min were compared to sham stimulations. No significant difference was found for any variable after real tDCS sessions when compared to the sham stimulations. This result suggests that effective offline tDCS for chronic pain might have different mechanisms of action. Cumulative effects, functional targeting and the unintended simultaneous stimulation of both M1 and the 1-DLPFC are likely responsible for the therapeutic effects of tDCS sessions in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [11] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Healthy and Neuropsychiatric Samples: Influence of Stimulation Parameters
    Dedoncker, Josefien
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Baeken, Chris
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (04) : 501 - 517
  • [12] Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results
    Dienes, Zoltan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [13] EFFECT OF ELECTRIC POLARIZATION OF SPINAL CORD ON CENTRAL AFFERENT FIBRES AND ON THEIR EXCITATORY SYNAPTIC ACTION
    ECCLES, JC
    SCHMIDT, RF
    KOSTYUK, PG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1962, 162 (01): : 138 - &
  • [14] A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia
    Fregni, Felipe
    Gimenes, Rafaela
    Valle, Angela C.
    Ferreira, Merari J. L.
    Rocha, Renata R.
    Natalle, Luane
    Bravo, Riviane
    Rigonatti, Sergio P.
    Freedman, Steven D.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (12): : 3988 - 3998
  • [15] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary sensory cortex on somatosensory perception
    Grundmann, Lisa
    Rolke, Roman
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Pavlakovic, Goran
    Happe, Svenja
    Treede, Rolf-Detlef
    Paulus, Walter
    Bachmann, Cornelius G.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2011, 4 (04) : 253 - 260
  • [16] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and the cardiovascular responses to acute pain in humans
    Hamner, J. W.
    Villamar, Mauricio F.
    Fregni, Felipe
    Taylor, J. Andrew
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (05) : 1039 - 1046
  • [17] Transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation appear to be safe neuromodulatory techniques useful in the treatment of anxiety disorders and other neuropsychiatric disorders
    Iannone, Aline
    de Mello Cruz, Antonio Pedro
    Brasil-Neto, Joaquim Pereira
    Boechat-Barros, Raphael
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2016, 74 (10) : 829 - 835
  • [18] Transcranial direct current stimulation does neither modulate results of a quantitative sensory testing protocol nor ratings of suprathreshold heat stimuli in healthy volunteers
    Juergens, T. P.
    Schulte, A.
    Klein, T.
    May, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 16 (09) : 1251 - 1263
  • [19] Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS
    Laakso, Ilkka
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    Koyama, Soichiro
    De Santis, Valerio
    Hirata, Akimasa
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (05) : 906 - 913
  • [20] Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018) (vol 131, pg 474, 2020)
    Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
    Aleman, Andre
    Baeken, Chris
    Benninger, David H.
    Brunelin, Jerome
    Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
    Filipovic, Sasa R.
    Grefkes, Christian
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    Hummel, Friedhelm C.
    Jaaskelainen, Satu K.
    Langguth, Berthold
    Leocani, Letizia
    Londero, Alain
    Nardone, Raffaele
    Nguyen, Jean-Paul
    Nyffeler, Thomas
    Oliveira-Maia, Albino J.
    Oliviero, Antonio
    Padberg, Frank
    Palm, Ulrich
    Paulus, Walter
    Poulet, Emmanuel
    Quartarone, Angelo
    Rachid, Fady
    Rektorova, Irena
    Rossi, Simone
    Sahlsten, Hanna
    Schecklmann, Martin
    Szekely, David
    Ziemann, Ulf
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 131 (05) : 1168 - 1169