Pre- and Posttreatment Voice and Speech Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Chemoradiotherapy: Expert Listeners' and Patient's Perception

被引:39
作者
van der Molen, Lisette [1 ]
van Rossum, Maya A. [2 ]
Jacobi, Irene [1 ]
van Son, Rob J. J. H. [1 ]
Smeele, Ludi E. [1 ]
Rasch, Coen R. N. [3 ]
Hilgers, Frans J. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Head & Neck Oncol & Surg, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Phonet Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Organ preservation; Perception experiment; Patients' view; Voice and speech function; Long-term results; OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT; SWALLOWING EXERCISES; ORGAN PRESERVATION; CHEMORADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; PRETREATMENT; DYSPHAGIA; REHABILITATION; CISPLATIN; RADPLAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.016
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives. Perceptual judgments and patients' perception of voice and speech after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for advanced head and neck cancer. Study Design. Prospective clinical trial. Methods. A standard Dutch text and a diadochokinetic task were recorded. Expert listeners rated voice and speech quality (based on Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), articulation (overall, [p], [t], [k]), and comparative mean opinion scores of voice and speech at three assessment points calculated. A structured study-specific questionnaire evaluated patients' perception pretreatment (N = 55), at 10-week (N = 49) and 1-year posttreatment (N = 37). Results. At 10 weeks, perceptual voice quality is significantly affected. The parameters overall voice quality (mean, -0.24; P = 0.008), strain (mean, -0.12; P = 0.012), nasality (mean, -0.08; P = 0.009), roughness (mean, -0.22; P = 0.001), and pitch (mean, -0.03; P = 0.041) improved over time but not beyond baseline levels, except for asthenia at 1-year posttreatment (voice is less asthenic than at baseline; mean, +0.20; P = 0.03). Perceptual analyses of articulation showed no significant differences. Patients judge their voice quality as good (score, 18/20) at all assessment points, but at 1-year posttreatment, most of them (70%) judge their "voice not as it used to be.'' In the 1-year versus 10-week posttreatment comparison, the larynx-hypopharynx tumor group was more strained, whereas nonlarynx tumor voices were judged less strained (mean, -0.33 and +0.07, respectively; P = 0.031). Patients' perceived changes in voice and speech quality at 10-week post-versus pretreatment correlate weakly with expert judgments. Conclusion. Overall, perceptual CCRT effects on voice and speech seem to peak at 10-week posttreatment but level off at 1-year posttreatment. However, at that assessment point, most patients still perceive their voice as different from baseline.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Structured assessment of the consequences of composite resection [J].
Ackerstaff, AH ;
Lindeboom, JAH ;
Balm, AJM ;
Kroon, FHM ;
Tan, IB ;
Hilgers, FJM .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1998, 23 (04) :339-344
[2]   Quality-of-life assessment after supradose selective intra-arterial cisplatin and concomitant radiation (RADPLAT) for inoperable stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Ackerstaff, AH ;
Tan, IB ;
Rasch, CRN ;
Balm, AJM ;
Keus, RB ;
Schornagel, JH ;
Hilgers, FJM .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2002, 128 (10) :1185-1190
[3]   FIRST-YEAR QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT OF AN INTRA-ARTERIAL (RADPLAT) VERSUS INTRAVENOUS CHEMORADIATION PHASE III TRIAL [J].
Ackerstaff, Annemieke H. ;
Balm, Alfons J. M. ;
Rasch, Coen R. N. ;
de Boer, Jan Paul ;
Wiggenraad, Ruud ;
Rietveld, Derk H. F. ;
Gregor, R. Theo ;
Kroger, Robert ;
Hilgers, Frans J. M. .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2009, 31 (01) :77-84
[4]   Chemo-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Bourhis, J. ;
Guigay, J. ;
Temam, S. ;
Pignon, J. P. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 :X39-X41
[5]   Voice and swallowing in patients enrolled in a larynx preservation trial [J].
Carrara-de Angelis, E ;
Feher, O ;
Barros, APB ;
Nishimoto, IN ;
Kowalski, LP .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (07) :733-738
[6]   Pretreatment Swallowing Exercises Improve Swallow Function After Chemoradiation [J].
Carroll, William R. ;
Locher, Julie L. ;
Canon, Cheri L. ;
Bohannon, Isaac A. ;
McColloch, Nancy L. ;
Magnuson, J. Scott .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2008, 118 (01) :39-43
[7]   Head and neck cancer - An evolving treatment paradigm [J].
Cognetti, David M. ;
Weber, Randal S. ;
Lai, Stephen Y. .
CANCER, 2008, 113 (07) :1911-1932
[8]   Evaluation of speech outcomes following treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers [J].
Dwivedi, Raghav C. ;
Kazi, Rehan A. ;
Agrawal, Nishant ;
Nutting, Christopher M. ;
Clarke, Peter M. ;
Kerawala, Cyrus J. ;
Rhys-Evans, Peter H. ;
Harrington, Kevin J. .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2009, 35 (05) :417-424
[9]   Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: Which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT? [J].
Eisbruch, A ;
Schwartz, M ;
Rasch, C ;
Vineberg, K ;
Damen, E ;
Van As, CJ ;
Marsh, R ;
Pameijer, FA ;
Balm, AJM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (05) :1425-1439
[10]  
Hirano M., 1981, CLIN EXAMINATION VOI