Pre- and Posttreatment Voice and Speech Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Chemoradiotherapy: Expert Listeners' and Patient's Perception

被引:37
作者
van der Molen, Lisette [1 ]
van Rossum, Maya A. [2 ]
Jacobi, Irene [1 ]
van Son, Rob J. J. H. [1 ]
Smeele, Ludi E. [1 ]
Rasch, Coen R. N. [3 ]
Hilgers, Frans J. M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Head & Neck Oncol & Surg, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Phonet Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Organ preservation; Perception experiment; Patients' view; Voice and speech function; Long-term results; OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT; SWALLOWING EXERCISES; ORGAN PRESERVATION; CHEMORADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; PRETREATMENT; DYSPHAGIA; REHABILITATION; CISPLATIN; RADPLAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.016
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives. Perceptual judgments and patients' perception of voice and speech after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for advanced head and neck cancer. Study Design. Prospective clinical trial. Methods. A standard Dutch text and a diadochokinetic task were recorded. Expert listeners rated voice and speech quality (based on Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), articulation (overall, [p], [t], [k]), and comparative mean opinion scores of voice and speech at three assessment points calculated. A structured study-specific questionnaire evaluated patients' perception pretreatment (N = 55), at 10-week (N = 49) and 1-year posttreatment (N = 37). Results. At 10 weeks, perceptual voice quality is significantly affected. The parameters overall voice quality (mean, -0.24; P = 0.008), strain (mean, -0.12; P = 0.012), nasality (mean, -0.08; P = 0.009), roughness (mean, -0.22; P = 0.001), and pitch (mean, -0.03; P = 0.041) improved over time but not beyond baseline levels, except for asthenia at 1-year posttreatment (voice is less asthenic than at baseline; mean, +0.20; P = 0.03). Perceptual analyses of articulation showed no significant differences. Patients judge their voice quality as good (score, 18/20) at all assessment points, but at 1-year posttreatment, most of them (70%) judge their "voice not as it used to be.'' In the 1-year versus 10-week posttreatment comparison, the larynx-hypopharynx tumor group was more strained, whereas nonlarynx tumor voices were judged less strained (mean, -0.33 and +0.07, respectively; P = 0.031). Patients' perceived changes in voice and speech quality at 10-week post-versus pretreatment correlate weakly with expert judgments. Conclusion. Overall, perceptual CCRT effects on voice and speech seem to peak at 10-week posttreatment but level off at 1-year posttreatment. However, at that assessment point, most patients still perceive their voice as different from baseline.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Structured assessment of the consequences of composite resection
    Ackerstaff, AH
    Lindeboom, JAH
    Balm, AJM
    Kroon, FHM
    Tan, IB
    Hilgers, FJM
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1998, 23 (04): : 339 - 344
  • [2] Quality-of-life assessment after supradose selective intra-arterial cisplatin and concomitant radiation (RADPLAT) for inoperable stage IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Ackerstaff, AH
    Tan, IB
    Rasch, CRN
    Balm, AJM
    Keus, RB
    Schornagel, JH
    Hilgers, FJM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2002, 128 (10) : 1185 - 1190
  • [3] FIRST-YEAR QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT OF AN INTRA-ARTERIAL (RADPLAT) VERSUS INTRAVENOUS CHEMORADIATION PHASE III TRIAL
    Ackerstaff, Annemieke H.
    Balm, Alfons J. M.
    Rasch, Coen R. N.
    de Boer, Jan Paul
    Wiggenraad, Ruud
    Rietveld, Derk H. F.
    Gregor, R. Theo
    Kroger, Robert
    Hilgers, Frans J. M.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2009, 31 (01): : 77 - 84
  • [4] Chemo-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer
    Bourhis, J.
    Guigay, J.
    Temam, S.
    Pignon, J. P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : X39 - X41
  • [5] Voice and swallowing in patients enrolled in a larynx preservation trial
    Carrara-de Angelis, E
    Feher, O
    Barros, APB
    Nishimoto, IN
    Kowalski, LP
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (07) : 733 - 738
  • [6] Pretreatment Swallowing Exercises Improve Swallow Function After Chemoradiation
    Carroll, William R.
    Locher, Julie L.
    Canon, Cheri L.
    Bohannon, Isaac A.
    McColloch, Nancy L.
    Magnuson, J. Scott
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2008, 118 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [7] Head and neck cancer - An evolving treatment paradigm
    Cognetti, David M.
    Weber, Randal S.
    Lai, Stephen Y.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 113 (07) : 1911 - 1932
  • [8] Evaluation of speech outcomes following treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers
    Dwivedi, Raghav C.
    Kazi, Rehan A.
    Agrawal, Nishant
    Nutting, Christopher M.
    Clarke, Peter M.
    Kerawala, Cyrus J.
    Rhys-Evans, Peter H.
    Harrington, Kevin J.
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2009, 35 (05) : 417 - 424
  • [9] Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: Which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT?
    Eisbruch, A
    Schwartz, M
    Rasch, C
    Vineberg, K
    Damen, E
    Van As, CJ
    Marsh, R
    Pameijer, FA
    Balm, AJM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (05): : 1425 - 1439
  • [10] Hirano M., 1981, CLIN EXAMINATION VOI