Approximate and limited reasoning: Semantics, proof theory, expressivity and control

被引:15
作者
Finger, M [1 ]
Wasserman, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Math & Stat, Dept Comp Sci, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
automated reasoning; deductive systems; approximate reasoning; limited reasoning; non-classical logics; knowledge representation;
D O I
10.1093/logcom/14.2.179
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Real agents (natural or artificial) are limited in their reasoning capabilities. In this paper, we present a general framework for modelling limited reasoning based on approximate reasoning and discuss its properties. We start from Cadoli and Schaerf's approximate entailment. We first extend their system to deal with the full language of propositional logic. A tableau inference system is proposed for the extended system together with a subclassical semantics; it is shown that this new approximate reasoning system is sound and complete with respect to this semantics. We show how this system can be incrementally used to move from one approximation to the next until the reasoning limitation is reached. We also present a sound and complete axiomatization of the extended system. We note that although the extension is more expressive than the original system, it offers less control over the approximation process. We then propose a more general system and show that it keeps the increased expressivity and recovers the control. A sound and complete formulation for this new system is given and its expressivity and control advantages are formally proved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 204
页数:26
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Anderson A. R., 1975, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, VI
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1984, P AAAI 84
  • [3] [Anonymous], LOGIC J IGPL
  • [4] BRODA K, 1995, P 4 INT WORKSH AN TA
  • [5] Cadoli M., 1995, Fundamenta Informaticae, V23, P123
  • [6] On the complexity of entailment in propositional multivalued logics
    Cadoli, M
    Schaerf, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1996, 18 (01) : 29 - 50
  • [7] CHOPRA S, 2001, LOG J IGPL, V9, P755
  • [8] d'Agostino M., 1994, Journal of Logic and Computation, V4, P285, DOI 10.1093/logcom/4.3.285
  • [9] d'Agostino M., 1992, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, V1, P235, DOI 10.1007/BF00156916
  • [10] da Costa N., 1977, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V18, P621, DOI DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1093888132