共 56 条
A Substantial and Unexpected Enhancement of Motion Perception in Autism
被引:117
作者:
Foss-Feig, Jennifer H.
[1
]
Tadin, Duje
[2
]
Schauder, Kimberly B.
[3
,4
]
Cascio, Carissa J.
[2
,5
]
机构:
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Vanderbilt Kennedy Ctr, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Ctr Visual Sci, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[4] Univ Rochester, Dept Ophthalmol, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychiat, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
DIAGNOSTIC OBSERVATION SCHEDULE;
CENTER-SURROUND INTERACTIONS;
CONTRAST GAIN-CONTROL;
VISUAL-MOTION;
CHILDREN;
SPECTRUM;
SEARCH;
EXCITATION/INHIBITION;
DISCRIMINATION;
ANTAGONISM;
D O I:
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1608-12.2013
中图分类号:
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号:
071006 ;
摘要:
Atypical perceptual processing in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is well documented. In addition, growing evidence supports the hypothesis that an excitatory/inhibitory neurochemical imbalance might underlie ASD. Here we investigated putative behavioral consequences of the excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in the context of visual motion perception. As stimulus size increases, typical observers exhibit marked impairments in perceiving motion of high-contrast stimuli. This result, termed "spatial suppression," is believed to reflect inhibitory motion-processing mechanisms. Motion processing is also affected by gain control, an inhibitory mechanism that underlies saturation of neural responses at high contrast. Motivated by these behavioral correlates of inhibitory function, we investigated motion perception in human children with ASD (n = 20) and typical development (n = 26). At high contrast, both groups exhibited similar impairments in motion perception with increasing stimulus size, revealing no apparent differences in spatial suppression. However, there was a substantial enhancement of motion perception in ASD: children with ASD exhibited a consistent twofold improvement in perceiving motion. Hypothesizing that this enhancement might indicate abnormal weakening of response gain control, we repeated our measurements at low contrast, where the effects of gain control should be negligible. At low contrast, we indeed found no group differences in motion discrimination thresholds. These low-contrast results, however, revealed weaker spatial suppression in ASD, suggesting the possibility that gain control abnormalities in ASD might have masked spatial suppression differences at high contrast. Overall, we report a pattern of motion perception abnormalities in ASD that includes substantial enhancements at high contrast and is consistent with an underlying excitatory/inhibitory imbalance.
引用
收藏
页码:8243 / 8249
页数:7
相关论文