Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock

被引:1869
作者
Thiele, Holger [1 ]
Zeymer, Uwe [2 ,3 ]
Neumann, Franz-Josef [4 ]
Ferenc, Miroslaw [4 ]
Olbrich, Hans-Georg [5 ]
Hausleiter, Joerg [6 ]
Richardt, Gert [7 ]
Hennersdorf, Marcus [8 ]
Empen, Klaus [9 ]
Fuernau, Georg
Desch, Steffen
Eitel, Ingo
Hambrecht, Rainer [10 ]
Fuhrmann, Joerg [11 ]
Boehm, Michael [12 ]
Ebelt, Henning [13 ]
Schneider, Steffen [2 ,3 ]
Schuler, Gerhard
Werdan, Karl [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Ctr Heart, Dept Internal Med Cardiol, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, D-6700 Ludwigshafen, Germany
[3] Inst Herzinfarktforsch, Ludwigshafen, Germany
[4] Heart Ctr Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
[5] Asklepios Clin Langen Seligenstadt, Langen, Germany
[6] German Heart Ctr, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[7] Segeberger Kliniken, Ctr Heart, Bad Segeberg, Germany
[8] SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
[9] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
[10] Klinikum Links Weser, Bremen, Germany
[11] Zent Klin Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
[12] Univ Clin Saarland, Homburg, Germany
[13] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
关键词
ASSIST DEVICE; COUNTERPULSATION; MANAGEMENT; TRENDS; REVASCULARIZATION; TRIAL; PUMP;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1208410
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND In current international guidelines, intraaortic balloon counterpulsation is considered to be a class I treatment for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, evidence is based mainly on registry data, and there is a paucity of randomized clinical trials. METHODS In this randomized, prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 600 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction to intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP group, 301 patients) or no intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (control group, 299 patients). All patients were expected to undergo early revascularization (by means of percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery) and to receive the best available medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Safety assessments included major bleeding, peripheral ischemic complications, sepsis, and stroke. RESULTS A total of 300 patients in the IABP group and 298 in the control group were included in the analysis of the primary end point. At 30 days, 119 patients in the IABP group (39.7%) and 123 patients in the control group (41.3%) had died (relative risk with IABP, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.17; P = 0.69). There were no significant differences in secondary end points or in process-of-care measures, including the time to hemodynamic stabilization, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, serum lactate levels, the dose and duration of catecholamine therapy, and renal function. The IABP group and the control group did not differ significantly with respect to the rates of major bleeding (3.3% and 4.4%, respectively; P = 0.51), peripheral ischemic complications (4.3% and 3.4%, P = 0.53), sepsis (15.7% and 20.5%, P = 0.15), and stroke (0.7% and 1.7%, P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS The use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction for whom an early revascularization strategy was planned. (Funded by the German Research Foundation and others; IABP-SHOCK II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00491036.)
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1296
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Comparison of Hospital Mortality With Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Insertion Before Versus After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    Saad, Mohammed
    Kynast, Joerg
    Geist, Volker
    Sherif, Mohammad A.
    Richardt, Gert
    Toelg, Ralph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 105 (07) : 967 - 971
  • [2] Antman Elliott M, 2004, J Am Coll Cardiol, V44, P671, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.002
  • [3] Antman EM., 2005, CIRCULATION, V111, P2013
  • [4] Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Babaev, A
    Frederick, PD
    Pasta, DJ
    Every, N
    Sichrovsky, T
    Hochman, JS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04): : 448 - 454
  • [5] Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Cheng, Jin M.
    den Uil, Corstiaan A.
    Hoeks, Sanne E.
    van der Ent, Martin
    Jewbali, Lucia S. D.
    van Domburg, Ron T.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (17) : 2102 - 2108
  • [6] PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE
    COCKCROFT, DW
    GAULT, MH
    [J]. NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [7] Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: A report from the SHOCK trial registry
    Fincke, R
    Hochman, JS
    Lowe, AM
    Menon, V
    Slater, JN
    Webb, JG
    LeJemtel, TH
    Cotter, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) : 340 - 348
  • [8] Thirty-Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction A Population-Based Perspective
    Goldberg, Robert J.
    Spencer, Frederick A.
    Gore, Joel M.
    Lessard, Darleen
    Yarzebski, Jorge
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2009, 119 (09) : 1211 - 1219
  • [9] Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Hochman, JS
    Sleeper, LA
    Webb, JG
    Sanborn, TA
    White, HD
    Talley, JD
    Buller, CE
    Jacobs, AK
    Slater, JN
    Col, J
    McKinlay, SM
    LeJemtel, TH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (09) : 625 - 634
  • [10] Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction - Expanding the paradigm
    Hochman, JS
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (24) : 2998 - 3002