Uncertainty Quantification of Global Net Methane Emissions From Terrestrial Ecosystems Using a Mechanistically Based Biogeochemistry Model

被引:21
|
作者
Liu, Licheng [1 ]
Zhuang, Qianlai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Oh, Youmi [1 ]
Shurpali, Narasinha J. [4 ]
Kim, Seungbum [5 ]
Poulter, Ben [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Climate Change Res Ctr, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Environm Sci, Kuopio, Finland
[5] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[6] Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[7] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Biospher Sci Lab, Greenbelt, MD USA
关键词
wetland methane emission; biogeochemistry modeling; uncertainty analysis; global modeling; NATURAL WETLANDS; ATMOSPHERIC METHANE; MINNESOTA PEATLAND; GAS-EXCHANGE; CH4; FLUXES; CLIMATE; VEGETATION; PATTERNS; SOIL; N2O;
D O I
10.1029/2019JG005428
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantification of methane (CH4) emissions from wetlands and its sinks from uplands is still fraught with large uncertainties. Here, a methane biogeochemistry model was revised, parameterized, and verified for various wetland ecosystems across the globe. The model was then extrapolated to the global scale to quantify the uncertainty induced from four different types of uncertainty sources including parameterization, wetland type distribution, wetland area distribution, and meteorological input. We found that global wetland emissions are 212 +/- 62 and 212 +/- 32 Tg CH(4)year(-1)(1Tg = 10(12) g) due to uncertain parameters and wetland type distribution, respectively, during 2000-2012. Using two wetland distribution data sets and three sets of climate data, the model simulations indicated that the global wetland emissions range from 186 to 212 CH(4)year(-1)for the same period. The parameters were the most significant uncertainty source. After combining the global methane consumption in the range of -34 to -46 Tg CH(4)year(-1), we estimated that the global net land methane emissions are 149-176 Tg CH(4)year(-1)due to uncertain wetland distribution and meteorological input. Spatially, the northeast United States and Amazon were two hotspots of methane emission, while consumption hotspots were in the Eastern United States and eastern China. During 1950-2016, both wetland emissions and upland consumption increased during El Nino events and decreased during La Nina events. This study highlights the need for more in situ methane flux data, more accurate wetland type, and area distribution information to better constrain the model uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Climate and land use change impacts on global terrestrial ecosystems and river flows in the HadGEM2-ES Earth system model using the representative concentration pathways
    Betts, R. A.
    Golding, N.
    Gonzalez, P.
    Gornall, J.
    Kahana, R.
    Kay, G.
    Mitchell, L.
    Wiltshire, A.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2015, 12 (05) : 1317 - 1338
  • [32] Methane emission from pan-Arctic natural wetlands estimated using a process-based model, 1901-2016
    Ito, Akihiko
    POLAR SCIENCE, 2019, 21 : 26 - 36
  • [33] Soil thermal dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems of the conterminous United States from 1948 to 2008: an analysis with a process-based soil physical model and AmeriFlux data
    Hao, Guangcun
    Zhuang, Qianlai
    Pan, Jianjun
    Jin, Zhenong
    Zhu, Xudong
    Liu, Shaoqing
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 126 (1-2) : 135 - 150
  • [34] City-wide model-based analysis of heat recovery from wastewater using an uncertainty-based approach
    Saagi, R.
    Arnell, M.
    Warff, C.
    Ahlstrom, M.
    Jeppsson, U.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 820
  • [35] Reconstructing and quantifying methane emissions from the full duration of a 38-day natural gas well blowout using space-based observations
    Maasakkers, Joannes D.
    Omara, Mark
    Gautam, Ritesh
    Lorente, Alba
    Pandey, Sudhanshu
    Tol, Paul
    Borsdorff, Tobias
    Houweling, Sander
    Aben, Ilse
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 270
  • [36] Inverse modeling of pan-Arctic methane emissions at high spatial resolution: what can we learn from assimilating satellite retrievals and using different process-based wetland and lake biogeochemical models?
    Tan, Zeli
    Zhuang, Qianlai
    Henze, Daven K.
    Frankenberg, Christian
    Dlugokencky, Ed
    Sweeney, Colm
    Turner, Alexander J.
    Sasakawa, Motoki
    Machida, Toshinobu
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2016, 16 (19) : 12649 - 12666
  • [37] Whole-farm greenhouse gas emissions from a backgrounding beef production system using an observation-based and model-based approach
    Stewart, A. A.
    Alemu, A. W.
    Ominski, K. H.
    Wilson, C. H.
    Tremorin, D. G.
    Wittenberg, K. M.
    Tenuta, M.
    Janzen, H. H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 94 (03) : 463 - 477
  • [38] Buffering effect of global vegetation on the air-land exchange of mercury: Insights from a novel terrestrial mercury model based on CESM2-CLM5
    Yuan, Tengfei
    Zhang, Peng
    Song, Zhengcheng
    Huang, Shaojian
    Wang, Xun
    Zhang, Yanxu
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 174
  • [39] Using model-based inference to evaluate global fisheries status from landings, location, and life history data
    Thorson, James T.
    Branch, Trevor A.
    Jensen, Olaf P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2012, 69 (04) : 645 - 655
  • [40] From site-level to global simulation: Reconciling carbon, water and energy fluxes over different spatial scales using a process-based ecophysiological land-surface model
    Alton, Paul B.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2013, 176 : 111 - 124