Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions

被引:3
作者
Almasarweh, Sa'ed [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sudah, Mazen [1 ,2 ]
Okuma, Hidemi [1 ]
Joukainen, Sarianna [4 ]
Karja, Vesa [5 ]
Vanninen, Ritva [1 ,2 ]
Masarwah, Amro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Diagnost Imaging Ctr, Dept Clin Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Clin Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Essen Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[4] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Div Surg, Kuopio, Finland
[5] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Diagnost Imaging Ctr, Dept Clin Pathol, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
breast cancer; radiography; digital breast tomosynthesis; surgery; mammography; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; INTRAOPERATIVE SPECIMEN; CONSERVING SURGERY; MARGIN ASSESSMENT; CANCER; LUMPECTOMY; MASTECTOMY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.2478/raon-2022-0036
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The aim of the study was to compare the performance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system (SRS) in consecutive patients, and to compare the margin status of resected lesions versus pathological assessment. Patients and methods Resected tissue specimens from consecutive patients who underwent intraoperative breast specimen assessment following wide local excision or oncoplastic breast conservative surgery were examined by FFDM, tomosynthesis and SRS. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the visibility of lesions, size, margins, spiculations, calcifications and diagnostic certainty, and chose the best performing method in a blinded manner. Results We evaluated 216 specimens from 204 patients. All target malignant lesions were removed with no tumouron-ink. One papilloma had positive microscopic margins and one patient underwent reoperation owing to extensive in situ components. There were no significant differences in measured lesion size among the three methods. However, tomosynthesis was the most accurate modality when compared with the final pathological report. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis had significantly better lesion visibility than SRS and FFDM, which translated into a significantly greater diagnostic certainty. Tomosynthesis was superior to the other two methods in identifying spiculations and calcifications. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis was the best performing method in 76.9% of cases. The interobserver reproducibilities of lesion visibility and diagnostic certainty were high for all three methods. Conclusions Tomosynthesis was superior to SRS and FFDM for detecting and evaluating the target lesions, spiculations and calcifications, and was therefore more reliable for assessing complete excision of breast lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 470
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
    Amer, Heba A.
    Schmitzberger, Florian
    Ingold-Heppner, Barbara
    Kussmaul, Julia
    El Tohamy, Manal F.
    Tantawy, Hazim I.
    Hamm, B.
    Makowski, M.
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 93 : 258 - 264
  • [2] Breast surgical specimen radiographs: How reliable are they?
    Britton, P. D.
    Sonoda, L. I.
    Yamamoto, A. K.
    Koo, B.
    Soh, E.
    Goud, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 79 (02) : 245 - 249
  • [3] Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving therapy: A systematic review
    Butler-Henderson, Kerryn
    Lee, Andy H.
    Price, Roger I.
    Waring, Kaylene
    [J]. BREAST, 2014, 23 (02) : 112 - 119
  • [4] Comparison of Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Breast-Conserving Surgery Alone: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Jun-Ying
    Huang, Yi-Jie
    Zhang, Liu-Lu
    Yang, Ci-Qiu
    Wang, Kun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (03) : 321 - +
  • [5] Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Anderson, S
    Bryant, J
    Margolese, RG
    Deutsch, M
    Fisher, ER
    Jeong, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) : 1233 - 1241
  • [6] Intraoperative digital breast tomosynthesis using a dedicated device is more accurate than standard intraoperative mammography for identifying positive margins
    Garlaschi, A.
    Fregatti, P.
    Oddone, C.
    Friedman, D.
    Houssami, N.
    Calabrese, M.
    Tagliafico, A. S.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (12) : 974.e1 - 974.e6
  • [7] The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Macaskill, Petra
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Morrow, Monica
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 717 - 730
  • [8] Can supine breast magnetic resonance imaging help hit the target in extreme oncoplastic surgery?
    Joukainen, Sarianna
    Okuma, Hidemi
    Kaarela, Outi
    Laaksonen, Elina
    Karja, Vesa
    Vanninen, Ritva
    Masarwah, Amro
    Sudah, Mazen
    [J]. EJSO, 2021, 47 (11): : 2788 - 2796
  • [9] Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members
    Landercasper, Jeffrey
    Borgert, Andrew J.
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Cody, Hiram
    Feldman, Sheldon
    Greenberg, Caprice
    Linebarger, Jared
    Pockaj, Barbara
    Wilke, Lee
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (10) : 3321 - 3336
  • [10] Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Wire-Localized Breast-Conserving Surgery for Invasive Cancer: A Population-Level Comparison of Techniques
    Laws, Alison
    Brar, Mantaj S.
    Bouchard-Fortier, Antoine
    Leong, Brad
    Quan, May Lynn
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) : 3290 - 3296