Effects of contrastive accents on children's discourse comprehension

被引:9
|
作者
Lee, Eun-Kyung [1 ]
Snedeker, Jesse [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept English Language & Literature, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Language comprehension; Contrastive accents; Discoursre; Memory; PITCH ACCENTS; INTONATION; MEMORY; ADULTS; ALTERNATIVES; RESOLUTION; FOCUS; AGE;
D O I
10.3758/s13423-016-1069-7
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
What role do contrastive accents play in children's discourse comprehension? By 6 years of age, children use contrastive accents during online comprehension to predict upcoming referents (Ito et al., 2014; Sekerina & Trueswell, 2012). But, at this age, children's performance on offline tasks of accent comprehension is poor (e.g., Wells et al., 2004). To examine whether the asymmetry could reflect a developmental stage in which the processing system uses contrastive accents to make local predictions, but fails to incorporate this information into discourse representations, we tested the effect of contrastive accents on children's memory of the content of a discourse. Five-year-olds heard 12 different stories consecutively, one after another, and the critical words were manipulated so that they were produced either with a contrastive L+H* accent or with a presentational H* accent. We found that children remembered facts about the contrast set better when the target word had an appropriate contrastive accent earlier than when it had a presentational accent. The results show that by 5 years, children are able to use contrastive accents for encoding a discourse, as well as for making local predictions during online comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1595
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Effects of Age on the Strategic Use of Pitch Accents in Memory for Discourse: A Processing-Resource Account
    Fraundorf, Scott H.
    Watson, Duane G.
    Benjamin, Aaron S.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (01) : 88 - 98
  • [32] Native-like processing of prominence cues in L2 written discourse comprehension: Evidence from font emphasis
    Lee, Eun-Kyung
    Fraundorf, Scott
    APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2019, 40 (02) : 373 - 398
  • [33] The effects of instruction on situation model construction: an eye fixation study on text comprehension in primary school children
    van der Schoot, Menno
    Horsley, Tako M.
    van Lieshout, Ernest C. D. M.
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 30 (07) : 817 - 835
  • [34] Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting
    Klatte, Maria
    Lachmann, Thomas
    Meis, Markus
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2010, 12 (49) : 270 - 282
  • [35] The anterior temporal lobes support residual comprehension in Wernicke's aphasia
    Robson, Holly
    Zahn, Roland
    Keidel, James L.
    Binney, Richard J.
    Sage, Karen
    Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon
    BRAIN, 2014, 137 : 931 - 943
  • [36] Contrastive intonation effects on word recall for information-structural alternatives across the sexes
    Xaver Koch
    Katharina Spalek
    Memory & Cognition, 2021, 49 : 1312 - 1333
  • [37] Anticipating predictability: an ERP investigation of expectation-managing discourse markers in dialogue comprehension
    Rasenberg, Marlou
    Rommers, Joost
    van Bergen, Geertje
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 35 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [38] Contrastive intonation effects on word recall for information-structural alternatives across the sexes
    Koch, Xaver
    Spalek, Katharina
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2021, 49 (07) : 1312 - 1333
  • [39] The relations between children's comprehension monitoring and their reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge: an eye-movement study
    Zargar, Elham
    Adams, Ashley Marie
    Connor, Carol McDonald
    READING AND WRITING, 2020, 33 (03) : 511 - 545
  • [40] Finding referents in time: Eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents
    Weber, Andrea
    Braun, Bettina
    Crocker, Matthew W.
    LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2006, 49 : 367 - 392