The larger the damselfly, the more likely to be threatened: a sexual selection approach

被引:17
作者
Suarez-Tovar, Catalina M. [1 ,2 ]
Rocha-Ortega, Maya [2 ]
Gonzalez-Voyer, Alejandro [2 ]
Gonzalez-Tokman, Daniel [3 ]
Cordoba-Aguilar, Alex [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Posgrad Ciencias Biol, Av Ciudad Univ 3000, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ecol, Apdo Postal 70-275,Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Inst Ecol AC, Red Ecoetol, CONACyT, Carretera Antigua Coatepec 351, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico
关键词
Damselflies; Extinction risk; Body size; Mating system; Dimorphism; IUCN; EXTINCTION RISK; BODY-SIZE; FRESH-WATER; MATING SUCCESS; ODONATA; VULNERABILITY; CONSERVATION; DRAGONFLIES; DIVERSITY; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10841-019-00142-0
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In a changing world due to anthropogenic activities, it is increasingly urgent to identify the biological attributes that predispose species to extinction. Using phylogenetic comparative methods and International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List categories as a proxy for vulnerability to extinction, we evaluated whether body size, sexual size dimorphism and/or mating system (territorial or non-territorial) are linked to extinction risk in 139 damselfly (Odonata: Zygoptera) species. Threatened species of damselflies were, on average, larger than non-threatened species. However, we did not find a relationship between sexual size dimorphism or mating system and extinction risk. Similar to vertebrates and other insects, a large size implies a higher viability costs for damselflies. Other evolutionary mechanisms and not only sexual selection may play an important role in selecting for large body size and rendering larger species more prone to extinction.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 545
页数:11
相关论文
共 104 条
[61]   Body size and social dominance influence breeding dispersal in male Pachydiplax longipennis (Odonata) [J].
McCauley, Shannon J. .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2010, 35 (03) :377-385
[62]   Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: Combining ecological and paleontological views [J].
McKinney, ML .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1997, 28 :495-516
[63]  
McLain DK, 1999, EVOL ECOL RES, V1, P549
[64]  
Moody Dwight L., 2009, Ohio Journal of Science, V109, P67
[65]  
MOORE AJ, 1989, ETHOLOGY, V80, P120
[66]   Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds [J].
Morrow, EH ;
Pitcher, TE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 (1526) :1793-1799
[67]  
Nava-Bolaños A, 2017, BIOL J LINN SOC, V120, P804
[68]  
New T.R., 2012, Insect Conservation: Past, Present and Prospect
[69]  
Ogogo A. U., 2013, Natural Science, V5, P914, DOI 10.4236/ns.2013.58110
[70]   Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world's freshwater and marine fishes [J].
Olden, Julian D. ;
Hogan, Zeb S. ;
Vander Zanden, M. Jake .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (06) :694-701