Single Incision Trans-Umbilical Total Hysterectomy: Robotic or Laparoscopic?

被引:19
作者
Akdemir, Ali [1 ]
Yildirim, Nuri [3 ]
Zeybek, Burak [1 ]
Karaman, Semra [2 ]
Sendag, Fatih [1 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Single-port laparoscopy; TRANSUMBILICAL TOTAL HYSTERECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; INITIAL REPORT; SITE PLATFORM; UNITED-STATES; SURGERY; FEASIBILITY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1159/000370000
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the early surgical outcomes in patients who underwent total hysterectomy with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS-TH) versus robotic single-site total hysterectomy (RSSTH). Methods: Twenty-four patients who underwent RSSTH and thirty-four patients who underwent LESS-TH were retrospectively evaluated. Patient characteristics, operation time, intraoperative data (conversions, complications, estimated blood loss, etc.) and postoperative pain scores were compared. Results: The total operation time was significantly longer in the robotic surgery group, with a time of 98.5 vs. 86 min (p = 0.013), while vaginal closure time was significantly higher in the laparoscopic surgery group (p = 0.011). Intraoperative outcomes and postoperative pain scores were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: RSS-TH helps surgeons to overcome the technical disadvantages of LESS-TH, particularly vaginal cuff closure, ergonomics and instrument crowding and clashing. Early surgical outcomes are comparable in the two groups, and both techniques are safe and feasible. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 98
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Akdemir A, 2014, J MINIM INVASIVE GYN
  • [2] Akdemir A, 2013, J RES MED SCI, V18, P777
  • [3] Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome
    Cela, V.
    Freschi, L.
    Simi, G.
    Ruggiero, M.
    Tana, R.
    Pluchino, N.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (07): : 2638 - 2643
  • [4] Gynecologic laparoscopy
    DeSimone, Christopher P.
    Ueland, Frederick R.
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 88 (02) : 319 - +
  • [5] da Vinci® single-site platform: anthropometrical, docking and suturing considerations for hysterectomy in the cadaver model
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    Knight, Jason
    Rao, Sanjay
    Weinberg, Lori
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2012, 8 (02) : 191 - 195
  • [6] Comparison of Single-Port Laparoscopy, Standard Laparoscopy, and Robotic Surgery in Patients with Endometrial Cancer
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    Frumovitz, Michael
    Soliman, Pamela T.
    Frasure, Heidi E.
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    Schmeler, Kathleen M.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 1583 - 1588
  • [7] Single-Port Surgery: Laboratory Experience with the daVinci Single-Site Platform
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Kroh, Matthew
    Chalikonda, Sricharan
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2011, 15 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [8] Evaluation of a novel single-port robotic platform in the cadaver model for the performance of various procedures in gynecologic oncology
    Escobar, Pedro F.
    Kebria, Mehdi
    Falcone, Tommaso
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 120 (03) : 380 - 384
  • [9] Fader AN, 2010, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V203
  • [10] Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSS-H) vs. laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy (LESS-H) in early endometrial cancer: A double-institution case-control study
    Fagotti, A.
    Corrado, G.
    Fanfani, F.
    Mancini, M.
    Paglia, A.
    Vizzielli, G.
    Sindico, S.
    Scambia, G.
    Vizza, E.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 130 (01) : 219 - 223