A pilot-study of a minimally invasive technique to elevate the sinus floor membrane and place graft for augmentation using high hydraulic pressure: 18-month follow-up of 20 cases

被引:14
作者
Jesch, Philip [1 ]
Bruckmoser, Emanuel [2 ]
Bayerle, Andreas [3 ]
Eder, Klaus
Bayerle-Eder, Michaela [4 ]
Watzinger, Franz
机构
[1] Dent Clin Wienerberg City, Vienna, Austria
[2] Morriston Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Swansea SA6 6NL, W Glam, Wales
[3] Jeder GmbH, Dent Technol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Internal Med 2, Vienna, Austria
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY | 2013年 / 116卷 / 03期
关键词
IMPLANT PLACEMENT; MAXILLARY; LIFT; MULTICENTER; COMBINATION; SURVIVAL; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2013.05.014
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate medical efficacy and safety of crestal, minimally invasive sinus floor augmentation (MISFA) using an innovative method based on high hydraulic pressure. Study design. Twenty MISFA using the novel Jeder-System were performed in 18 patients at 2 study sites in Vienna, Austria. The Jeder-System consists of the Jeder-drill, the Jeder-pump, and a connecting tube-set. The pump generates high hydraulic pressure (1.5 bar) pushing back the sinus membrane from the drill at the first perforation. The pump also monitors the whole procedure by constantly measuring pressure and volume. Results. Five percent membrane perforation rate (1/20) only detected in the postoperative computed tomography scan and without implication for implant placement. Height gain of 9.2 +/- 1.7 mm achieved (from 4.6 +/- 1.4 mm to 13.8 +/- 2.3 mm). Average patient satisfaction was 9.82 on scale from 1 to 10 (10 = very satisfied). Mean duration of sick leave was 0.19 days. 18-month survival rate was 95% (1/20 implant lost). Conclusions. Within the limits of a prospective open cohort study with 20 cases, our data demonstrate the safety and medical efficacy of the novel method.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 300
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMPENDIUM
[2]  
Artzi Z, 2003, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V18, P242
[3]  
Bassi MA, 2010, J OSTEOL BIOMAT, V1, P93
[4]   Minimal invasiver Sinuslift Grenzen und Möglichkeiten im atrophen OberkieferThe minimal sinus floor elevation – Limitation and possibilities in the atrophic maxilla [J].
A. Baumann ;
R. Ewers .
Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, 1999, 3 (Suppl 1) :S70-S73
[5]   Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure [J].
Berengo, M ;
Sivolella, S ;
Majzoub, Z ;
Cordioli, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 33 (02) :189-194
[6]   Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants .1. 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants [J].
Buser, D ;
MericskeStern, R ;
Bernard, JP ;
Behneke, A ;
Behneke, N ;
Hirt, HP ;
Belser, UC ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) :161-172
[7]   An 8-year retrospective study: 1,100 patients receiving 1,557 implants using the minimally invasive hydraulic sinus condensing technique [J].
Chen, L ;
Cha, J .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :482-491
[8]   The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface:: Early results from clinical trials on ITI® SLA implants [J].
Cochran, DL ;
Buser, D ;
ten Bruggenkate, CM ;
Weingart, D ;
Taylor, TM ;
Bernard, JP ;
Peters, F ;
Simpson, JP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (02) :144-153
[9]  
Hu XL, 2009, INT J PROSTHODONT, V22, P243
[10]  
Kfir Efraim, 2009, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V11 Suppl 1, pe83, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00213.x