Quality 4.0 conceptualisation and theoretical understanding: a global exploratory qualitative study

被引:74
作者
Antony, Jiju [1 ]
McDermott, Olivia [2 ]
Sony, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Khalifa Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Natl Univ Ireland, Coll Sci & Engn, Galway, Ireland
[3] Namibia Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Engn, Windhoek, Namibia
关键词
Quality; 4; 0; Quality management; Critical success factors; Organisational readiness; Leadership; skills; LEAN; 6; SIGMA; READINESS FACTORS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-07-2021-0215
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeQuality 4.0 has a unique potential to create a competitive advantage for organisations by improving customer experience and enhancing profitability. The purpose of this study is to examine Quality 4.0, the9; benefits, motivating factors, critical success factors and the skills required by quality professionals in the successful implementation of Quality 4.0. The study also investigates the organisational readiness factors9 and challenges that need to be addressed before Quality 4.0 adoption and assess their importance.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative interview approach was utilised by interviewing a panel of senior management, engineering and continuous improvement (CI); professionals working in leading companies in Asia, Europe and America who are currently deploying Quality 4.0.FindingsThis study provides a theoretical base for the Quality 4.0 body of knowledge in terms of an organisation's adoption and overcoming implementation challenges and providing examples of Quality 4.0 application. Organisations can use this study to understand what Quality 4.0 means to industry, the benefits and motivating factors for implementing, the Critical Success Factors, challenges, the organisational readiness factors and the role of leadership in a Quality 4.0 deployment. In addition, the study looks at the skills required by future Quality 4.0 professionals in terms of hard skills, soft skills and a curriculum for educating future quality management professionals. The respondents cited that predictive analytics, sensors and tracking, and electronic feedback loops are the most critical technologies for driving Quality 4.0.Research limitations/implicationsOne of the limitations of this research was that as this area is a nascent area the researchers were limited in their literature review. The second limitation was that the study was based on 12 interviews. A more comprehensive longitudinal study would yield more data so that better and robust conclusions can be derived from the study.Originality/valueThis is the first empirical study on Quality 4.0, which captures the viewpoints of senior management professionals on a full range of topics related to Quality 4.0 motivation for deployment, implementation and readiness for its adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:1169 / 1188
页数:20
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   How Ready Is Higher Education for Quality 4.0 Transformation according to the LNS Research Framework? [J].
Alzahrani, Bandar ;
Bahaitham, Haitham ;
Andejany, Murad ;
Elshennawy, Ahmad .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (09)
[2]   Identification of Factors Influencing the Performance of Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) [J].
Anggadwita, Grisna ;
Mustafid, Qaanita Yuuha .
5TH INDONESIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND SMALL BUSINESS (IICIES 2013), 2014, 115 :415-423
[3]  
[Anonymous], DAT SCI QUAL PROF
[4]   An Empirical Study Into Qualifications and Skills of Quality Management Practitioners in Contemporary Organizations: Results From a Global Survey and Agenda for Future Research [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Sony, Michael .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 70 (02) :478-494
[5]   Ten commandments of Lean Six Sigma: a practitioners' perspective [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Gupta, Sandeep ;
Sunder, Vijaya M. ;
Gijo, E. V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 67 (06) :1033-1044
[6]   Lean Six Sigma and Innovation - an exploratory study among UK organisations [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Setijono, Djoko ;
Dahlgaard, Jens J. .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2016, 27 (1-2) :124-140
[7]   Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector [J].
Antony, Jiju .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 63 (02) :257-+
[8]   Mapping the implications and competencies for Industry 4.0 to hard and soft total quality management [J].
Babatunde, Oluwayomi Kayode .
TQM JOURNAL, 2021, 33 (04) :896-914
[9]  
BCG, 2019, QUAL 4 0 CREAT SUBST
[10]   Potentials of industry 4.0 for supply chain management within the triple bottom line of sustainability e A systematic literature review [J].
Birkel, Hendrik ;
Muller, Julian M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 289