Ownership Consolidation and Product Characteristics: A Study of the US Daily Newspaper Market

被引:151
作者
Fan, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Econ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS; MERGERS; COMPETITION; VARIETY; INDUSTRIES; PRICES; ENTRY; POWER;
D O I
10.1257/aer.103.5.1598
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper develops a structural model of newspaper markets to analyze the effects of ownership consolidation, taking into account not only firms' price adjustments but also the adjustments in newspaper characteristics. A new dataset on newspaper prices and characteristics is used to estimate the model. The paper then simulates the effect of a merger in the Minneapolis newspaper market and studies how welfare effects of mergers vary with market characteristics. It finds that ignoring adjustments of product characteristics causes substantial differences in estimated effects of mergers. (JEL G32, L13, L82, M37)
引用
收藏
页码:1598 / 1628
页数:31
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ED PUBL INT YB
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, ANN EC STAT
[3]   Estimating market power in a two-sided market: The case of newspapers [J].
Argentesi, Elena ;
Filistrucchl, Lapo .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (07) :1247-1266
[4]  
Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC), 1998, NEWSP COUNT PEN REP
[5]  
Bacon's Information Inc, 1998, BAC NEWSP DIR
[6]   THE GAINS FROM MERGER OR COLLUSION IN PRODUCT-DIFFERENTIATED INDUSTRIES [J].
BAKER, JB ;
BRESNAHAN, TF .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 33 (04) :427-444
[7]   AUTOMOBILE PRICES IN MARKET EQUILIBRIUM [J].
BERRY, S ;
LEVINSOHN, J ;
PAKES, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1995, 63 (04) :841-890
[8]   Do mergers increase product variety? Evidence from radio broadcasting [J].
Berry, ST ;
Waldfogel, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (03) :1009-1025
[9]  
BORENSTEIN S, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P400
[10]   Mergers in Two-Sided Markets: An Application to the Canadian Newspaper Industry [J].
Chandra, Ambarish ;
Collard-Wexler, Allan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2009, 18 (04) :1045-1070