Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation

被引:1
作者
Huang, Wei-Hsiang [1 ]
Shih, Shu-Fang [2 ]
Lin, Chen-Li [3 ]
Liu, Chieh-Hsing [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Hlth Promot & Hlth Educ, 162,Sec 1,Heping E Rd, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Taipei City Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 12 Fuzhou St, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
Down syndrome; Screening and diagnosis; Attitudes; Decision-making; Validation; INFORMED CHOICE; 1ST-TRIMESTER; ABORTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-020-03093-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundDown syndrome is a common chromosomal abnormality and prenatal screening can inform parents of the risk of their baby having Down syndrome. Little research has examined how decisions regarding both Down syndrome screening as well as diagnosis are made among women who are currently pregnant and how their decisions are influenced by their social contexts, specifically family and social media, using mixed methods. The study was to test the validity and reliability of a scale that measures pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making concerning prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis in urban areas of Taiwan.MethodsWe developed an item pool based on a literature review and in-depth interviews with 30 pregnant women recruited at two district hospitals in urban areas. The item pool was reviewed by a panel of experts and then administered to 300 women who had been pregnant for less than 24weeks and had not received the Down syndrome screening tests. We used item analysis and exploratory factor analysis to validate the scale and test its reliability.ResultsThe initial item pool had 54 items. After the expert review, three items were deleted. After the item analysis, 16 additional items were deleted. Exploratory factor analysis of the remaining items revealed four factors labeled - "Attitudes towards Down syndrome and Screening Tests," "Important others' Attitudes towards Down Syndrome," "Influence of Important Others on Decision-Making," and "Influence of Social Media on Decision-Making" - and 16 of the remaining items had satisfactory loadings on those factors, explaining 72.0% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha values of the dimensions ranged between 0.75 and 0.90, demonstrating satisfactory internal reliability.ConclusionsThe scale has satisfactory validity and reliability, and can be used to understand pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding Down syndrome screening and diagnosis, and to help design tailored consultations for pregnant women in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, EUR J HUM GENET, V24, P809, DOI [10.1038/ejhg.2015.207, DOI 10.1038/EJHG.2015.207]
  • [2] Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: A challenge to practice and policy
    Asch, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (11) : 1649 - 1657
  • [3] Bollen Kenneth A, 1989, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, P226
  • [4] Carroll JC, 2000, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V46, P614
  • [5] Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome
    Chiang, HH
    Chao, YMY
    Yuh, YS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2006, 32 (05) : 273 - 277
  • [6] Chiang Hsien-Hsien, 2010, Hu Li Za Zhi, V57, P18
  • [7] Antenatal screening for aneuploidy
    Chitty, LS
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 10 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [8] Decision Making Following a Prenatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome: An Integrative Review
    Choi, Hyunkyung
    Van Riper, Marcia
    Thoyre, Suzanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2012, 57 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [9] Creswell JW., 2014, A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research
  • [10] How much do family physicians involve pregnant women in decisions about prenatal screening for Down syndrome?
    Gagnon, Susie
    Labrecque, Michel
    Njoya, Merlin
    Rousseau, Francois
    St-Jacques, Sylvie
    Legare, France
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2010, 30 (02) : 115 - 121