Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT

被引:31
作者
Garcia Silva, Maria Alves [1 ]
Wolf, Ulrich [2 ]
Heinicke, Frank [2 ]
Gruendler, Katharina
Visser, Heiko
Hirsch, Edgar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Dent, Dept Stomatol Sci, Goias, Brazil
[2] Univ Leipzig, Ctr Radiotherapy & Radiooncol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Sch Dent, Dept Dentomaxillofacial Radiol, Leipzig, Germany
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2008年 / 106卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.031
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective doses from analog film, panoramic digital, and panoramic scout for cone-beam computerized tomography (CT). Study design. Three different types of Veraviewepocs machines were investigated: Veraviewepocs Conventional, Veraviewepocs Digital, and Veraviewepocs 3D (Morita, Kyoto, Japan). Organ absorbed doses were measured using an anthropomorphic phantom loaded with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD 100H) at 16 sites located in sensitive organs. The resulting effective organ doses (mu Sv) were compared by descriptive statistics. Results. The highest value (5.2 mu Sv) was for Veraviewepocs Conventional. The Veraviewepocs Digital (2.7 mu Sv) and Veraviewepocs 3D (2.95 mu Sv) presented low effective doses in the same range. Conclusions. The panoramic digital system delivered the least radiation dose. The use of the panoramic scout for cone-beam CT was marginally higher in dose than its 2D counterpart. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:571-7)
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 577
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use [J].
Arai, Y ;
Tammisalo, E ;
Iwai, K ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Shinoda, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (04) :245-248
[2]  
CLARK D E, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P156
[3]   Radiation dose in dental radiology [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Kemper, J ;
Möbes, O ;
Pawelzik, J ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :634-637
[4]   Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine [J].
Danforth, RA ;
Clark, DE .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 89 (02) :236-243
[5]   Comparative dose measurements by spiral tomography for preimplant diagnosis: The Scanora machine versus the Cranex Tome radiography unit [J].
Dula, K ;
Mini, R ;
van der Stelt, PF ;
Sanderink, GCH ;
Schneeberger, P ;
Buser, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2001, 91 (06) :735-742
[6]   Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography [J].
Dula, K ;
Sanderink, G ;
van der Stelt, PF ;
Mini, R ;
Buser, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1998, 86 (02) :227-233
[7]   Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography:: a comparison with periapical radiography [J].
Ekestubbe, A ;
Thilander-Klang, A ;
Lith, A ;
Gröndahl, HG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (02) :87-92
[8]   Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor [J].
Farman, AG ;
Farman, TT .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1998, 11 (03) :166-168
[9]   The OP 100 Digipan - Evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry [J].
Farman, TT ;
Kelly, MS ;
Farman, AG .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1997, 83 (02) :281-287
[10]   EFFECTIVE DOSE AND RISK ASSESSMENT FROM FILM TOMOGRAPHY USED FOR DENTAL IMPLANT DIAGNOSTICS [J].
FREDERIKSEN, NL ;
BENSON, BW ;
SOKOLOWSKI, TW .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (03) :123-127