Consent for gynaecological procedure: what do women understand and remember?

被引:11
|
作者
Pathak, Sonu [2 ]
Odumosu, Modupe [2 ]
Peja, Syzana [2 ]
Mcintyre, Katrina [2 ]
Selo-Ojeme, Dan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chase Farm Hosp, Enfield EN2 8JL, Middx, England
[2] Barnet & Chase Farm Hosp NHS Trust, Womens Hlth Div, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Enfield EN2 8JL, Middx, England
关键词
Informed consent; Recall of risks; Clinical governance; INFORMED-CONSENT; PATIENTS RECALL; WRITTEN INFORMATION; SURGERY; RISKS;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-012-2518-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To determine patients' understanding and recall of consent information and risks associated with their procedure following gynaecological surgery. Patients planned for routine gynaecological surgery were invited to participate in the study by completing a self-administered questionnaire 4-6 h after day-surgery and 24 h after in-patient surgery. Collated data were analysed using standard statistical methods. 544 women participated in the study. 321 (57.9 %) were day-cases and 233 (42.1 %) were in-patients. 33 % and 30.8 % of in-patients and day-cases, respectively did not recall any risk associated with their procedure. Among in-patients, women who did not recall any risk were less likely to have post primary education (84.2 vs. 96.2 %, P = 0.008), understood an information leaflet (79.5 vs. 95.1 %, P = 0.002), understood the consent counselling (85.5 vs. 98 %, P = 0.001), or remember the explanation of procedure and risks (85.5 vs. 98 %, P = 0.001). Among women who did not recall any risk, the day-case women were less likely to have read the information leaflet (86.4 vs. 96.2 %, P = 0.002), understood the information leaflet (79.5 vs. 98.9 %, P = 0.007), or understood the consent counselling (85.5 vs. 98.9 %, P < 0.001) when compared to in-patients. A third of women who had planned gynaecology procedure do not recall any risk associated with the procedure. Provision of information leaflet did not make any consistent difference.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 63
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants?
    Pereira, Stacey
    Robinson, Jill Oliver
    McGuire, Amy L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (11) : 1524 - 1529
  • [22] Informed Consent in Patients Undergoing Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: What Do Patients Want to Know?
    Sandiford, Nemandra A.
    Mahendra, Maalee
    Wickramarachchi, Lilanthi
    Back, Diane
    Bansal, Mohit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [23] Why do women consent to surgery, even when they do not want to? An interactionist and Bourdieusian analysis
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Williams, Simon J.
    Jackson, Clare J.
    Akkad, Andrea
    Kenyon, Sara
    Habiba, Marwan
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 62 (11) : 2742 - 2753
  • [24] Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: A qualitative study
    Chew-Graham, Carolyn
    Mole, Eleanor
    Evans, Laura-Jane
    Rogers, Anne
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 61 (03) : 381 - 388
  • [25] Metal Hypersensitivity after Nuss Procedure: What and When to do?
    Evman, Serdar
    Akyil, Mustafa
    Bayram, Serkan
    Baysungur, Volkan
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2025,
  • [26] What do educational psychologists consider to be best practice when gaining consent across the 0 to 25 age range?
    Lyons, Althea
    Thomas, George
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY IN PRACTICE, 2024, 40 (02) : 201 - 219
  • [27] Informed consent procedure in a double blind randomized anthelminthic trial on Pemba Island, Tanzania: do pamphlet and information session increase caregivers knowledge?
    Marta S. Palmeirim
    Amanda Ross
    Brigit Obrist
    Ulfat A. Mohammed
    Shaali M. Ame
    Said M. Ali
    Jennifer Keiser
    BMC Medical Ethics, 21
  • [28] Informed consent procedure in a double blind randomized anthelminthic trial on Pemba Island, Tanzania: do pamphlet and information session increase caregivers knowledge?
    Palmeirim, Marta S.
    Ross, Amanda
    Obrist, Brigit
    Mohammed, Ulfat A.
    Ame, Shaali M.
    Ali, Said M.
    Keiser, Jennifer
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [29] 14-year-old Schoolchildren can Consent to Get Vaccinated in Tyrol, Austria: What do They know about Diseases and Vaccinations?
    Kreidl, Peter
    Breitwieser, Maria-Magdalena
    Wuerzner, Reinhard
    Borena, Wegene
    VACCINES, 2020, 8 (04) : 1 - 12
  • [30] What women think about consent to research at the time of an obstetric emergency: a qualitative study of the views of a cohort of World Maternal Antifibrinolytic Trial participants
    Houghton, G.
    Kingdon, C.
    Dower, M.
    Shakur-Still, H.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (13) : 1744 - 1753