Standards and reliability in evaluation: When rules of thumb don't apply

被引:47
作者
Norcini, JJ
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] ABIM, Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001888-199910000-00010
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to identify situations in which two rules of thumb in evaluation do not apply. The first rule is that all standards should be absolute. When selection decisions are being made or when classroom tests are given, however, relative standards may be better. The second rule of thumb is that every test should have a reliability of .80 or better. Depending on the circumstances, though, the standard error of measurement, the consistency of pass/fail classifications, and the domain-referenced reliability coefficients may be better indicators of reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1090
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, GUIDE CRITERION REFE
[2]  
BERK RA, 1986, REV EDUC RES, V56, P137, DOI 10.3102/00346543056001137
[3]  
BRENNAN RL, 1983, ELEMENTS GENERALIZAB
[4]  
COHEN JA, 1960, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V29, P323
[5]   The credibility and comparability of standards [J].
Norcini, JJ ;
Shea, JA .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1997, 10 (01) :39-59
[6]   THE MINI-CEX (CLINICAL-EVALUATION EXERCISE) - A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION [J].
NORCINI, JJ ;
BLANK, LL ;
ARNOLD, GK ;
KIMBALL, HR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 123 (10) :795-799
[7]  
SUBKOVIAK MJ, 1984, GUIDE CRITERION REFE
[8]   RELIABILITY OF CRITERION-REFERENCED TESTS - DECISION-THEORETIC FORMULATION [J].
SWAMINATHAN, H ;
HAMBLETON, RK ;
ALGINA, J .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1974, 11 (04) :263-267