Science Communication Training in North America: Preparing Whom to Do What With What Effect?

被引:45
作者
Dudo, Anthony [1 ]
Besley, John C. [2 ]
Yuan, Shupei [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Stan Richards Sch Advertising & Publ Relat, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Publ Relat, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Northern Illinois Univ, Dept Commun, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
关键词
science communication; public engagement; communication training; qualitative interviews; PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT; POPULAR SCIENCE; SCIENTISTS; MEDIA; PROGRAM; SKILLS; PARTICIPATION; RESEARCHERS; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1177/1075547020960138
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study identifies key characteristics of current science communication training programs based in North America. We report findings from semistructured interviews conducted with science communication trainers (N= 32) that examined programs' curricula, trainees, and impacts. Findings suggest that the current landscape of science communication training is one where a range of well-intentioned individuals and groups provide guidance to mostly self-selecting scientists. Training typically involves helping scientists find and refine their own message and then expecting these individuals to find their own opportunities to communicate. Programs commonly emphasize technical communication skills more than strategy, rarely conduct robust evaluation, and are not typically designed to enhance inclusivity. Researcher-trainer partnerships can help maximize the reach and positive impacts of these programs.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 63
页数:31
相关论文
共 111 条
[61]  
Lave J., 2011, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (24. print)
[62]   Bridging the opinion gap [J].
Leshner, Alan I. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 347 (6221) :459-459
[63]   Science mass communication - Its conceptual history [J].
Logan, RA .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2001, 23 (02) :135-163
[64]   Experientially learning how to communicate science effectively: A case study on decoding science [J].
Luisi, Monique L. R. ;
Rodgers, Shelly ;
Schultz, Jack C. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2019, 56 (08) :1135-1152
[65]   Understanding Public Responses to Emerging Technologies: A Narrative Approach [J].
Macnaghten, Phil ;
Davies, Sarah R. ;
Kearnes, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2019, 21 (05) :504-518
[66]   Organizational Influence on Scientists' Efforts to Go Public: An Empirical Investigation [J].
Marcinkowski, Frank ;
Kohring, Matthias ;
Fuerst, Silke ;
Friedrichsmeier, Andres .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2014, 36 (01) :56-80
[67]  
McNutt M., 2016, 2016 ANN LECT ANN PU
[68]  
Mercer-Mapstone L, 2017, INT J SCI EDUC PART, V7, P181, DOI 10.1080/21548455.2015.1113573
[69]   Can Science Communication Workshops Train Scientists for Reflexive Public Engagement? The ESConet Experience [J].
Miller, Steve ;
Fahy, Declan .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2009, 31 (01) :116-126
[70]  
Napolitano J., 2015, The Conversation