Prediction of coal ash leaching behavior in acid mine water: Comparison of laboratory and field studies

被引:3
作者
Ziemkiewicz, PF [1 ]
Knox, AS
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, W Virginia Water Res Inst, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Westinghouse Savannah River Co, Savannah River Lab, Aiken, SC 29808 USA
来源
COAL COMBUSTION BYPRODUCTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES | 2006年
关键词
D O I
10.1007/0-387-32177-2_6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Strongly alkaline fluidized bed combustion (FBC) ash is commonly used to control acid mine drainage (AMD) in West Virginia coal mines. Objectives include acid neutralization and immobilization of the primary AMD pollutants: iron, aluminum and manganese. The process has been successful in controlling AMD though doubts remain regarding mobilization of other toxic elements present in the ash. In addition, AMD contains many toxic elements in low concentrations. And, each mine produces AMD of widely varying quality. So, predicting the effect of a particular ash on a given coal mine's drainage quality is of particular interest. In this chapter we compare the results of a site-specific ash leaching procedure with two large-scale field applications of FBC ash. The results suggested a high degree of predictability for roughly half of the 25 chemical parameters and poor predictability for the remainder. Of these, seven parameters were successfully predicted on both sites: acidity, Al, B, Ba, Fe, Ni and Zn while electrical conductivity, Ca, Cd, SO4, Pb and Sb were not successfully predicted on either site. Trends for the remaining elements: As, Ag, Be, Cu, Cr, Hg, Mg, Mn, pH, Se T1 and V were successfully predicted on one but not both mine sites.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The leaching behavior of cement stabilized air pollution control residues: A comparison of field and laboratory investigations [J].
Baur, I ;
Ludwig, C ;
Johnson, CA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (13) :2817-2822
[42]   Fate of sulphate removed during the treatment of circumneutral mine water and acid mine drainage with coal fly ash: Modelling and experimental approach [J].
Madzivire, Godfrey ;
Gitari, Wilson M. ;
Vadapalli, V. R. Kumar ;
Ojumu, Tunde V. ;
Petrik, Leslie F. .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2011, 24 (13) :1467-1477
[43]   Sodium fluoride assisted acid leaching of coal fly ash for the extraction of alumina [J].
Tripathy, A. K. ;
Behera, B. ;
Aishvarya, V. ;
Sheik, A. R. ;
Dash, B. ;
Sarangi, C. K. ;
Tripathy, B. C. ;
Sanjay, K. ;
Bhattacharya, I. N. .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2019, 131 :140-145
[44]   Field studies of the leachability of aged brown coal ash [J].
Mudd, GM ;
Kodikara, J .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 76 (2-3) :159-192
[45]   Kinetics of Iron Extraction from Coal Fly Ash by Hydrochloric Acid Leaching [J].
Valeev, Dmitry ;
Mikhailova, Alexandra ;
Atmadzhidi, Alexandra .
METALS, 2018, 8 (07)
[46]   Laboratory investigation on behaviour of surface coal mine overburden stabilized with fly ash and lime [J].
Mishra, Manoj Kumar ;
Behera, Banita .
Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 2010, 58 (05) :129-133
[47]   Self inhibition of aluminum leaching from coal fly ash by sulfuric acid [J].
Technion - Israel Inst of Technology, Haifa, Israel .
Chem Eng Sci, 8 (195-207)
[48]   Ash and sulfur removal from tosya lignite coal with boric acid leaching [J].
Hacifazlioǧlu, Hasan ;
Uçkan, Dilara .
Madencilik, 2014, 53 (1-2) :21-29
[49]   Self inhibition of aluminum leaching from coal fly ash by sulfuric acid [J].
Seidel, A ;
Sluszny, A ;
Shelef, G ;
Zimmels, Y .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1999, 72 (03) :195-207
[50]   Comparison of gas and water pycnometry of coal mine wastes [J].
Univ of Queensland .
Geotech Test J, 1 (95-97)