Successful Identification of Pathogens by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Based Electron Spray Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) in Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection

被引:98
作者
Jacovides, Christina L. [1 ]
Kreft, Rachael
Adeli, Bahar
Hozack, Bryan
Ehrlich, Garth D.
Parvizi, Javad
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Rothman Inst Orthoped, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
DIAGNOSIS; KNEE; HIP; ARTHROPLASTY; PCR; REPLACEMENT; SONICATION; BIOFILM; FLUID;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.L.00210
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection poses many challenges, one of which is the difficulty of isolating the infecting organism. Recently, a sophisticated modality (the Ibis Biosciences T5000 biosensor system) has been introduced that uses pan-domain primers in a series of polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) to identify and speciate essentially all bacteria and fungi as well as to identify key antibiotic resistance genes. We investigated the role of the Ibis in identifying infecting organisms in cases of known and suspected periprosthetic joint infection. Methods: Synovial fluid specimens were collected prospectively from eighty-two patients undergoing eighty-seven arthroplasty procedures (sixty-five knee revisions, fifteen hip revisions, and seven primary knee arthroplasties) and were sent for both conventional culture and Ibis analysis. The surgeon's clinical determination of the cause for revision arthroplasty was failure due to infection in twenty-three cases and noninfectious failure in fifty-seven cases. Results: In the twenty-three cases that were considered on clinical grounds to involve a periprosthetic joint infection, the Ibis detected the same pathogen isolated by conventional culture in seventeen of eighteen cases and also detected one or more organisms in four of the five culture-negative cases. In addition, the Ibis detected organisms in fifty (88%) of the fifty-seven cases in which revision arthroplasty was performed for a presumed noninfectious failure. Conclusions: The Ibis technology was not only effective at detecting organisms in cases of suspected periprosthetic joint infection in which cultures were negative, but it also suggested that many of the revision arthroplasty cases that have previously been considered to be purely aseptic may have a component of unrecognized, subclinical infection.
引用
收藏
页码:2247 / 2254
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Improved Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection by Multiplex PCR of Sonication Fluid from Removed Implants [J].
Achermann, Yvonne ;
Vogt, Markus ;
Leunig, Michael ;
Wuest, Juerg ;
Trampuz, Andrej .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 48 (04) :1208-1214
[2]   Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection [J].
Bauer, TW ;
Parvizi, J ;
Kobayashi, N ;
Krebs, V .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (04) :869-882
[3]   Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection [J].
Berbari, Elie F. ;
Marculescu, Camelia ;
Sia, Irene ;
Lahr, Brian D. ;
Hanssen, Arlen D. ;
Steckelberg, James M. ;
Gullerud, Rachel ;
Osmon, Douglas R. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 45 (09) :1113-1119
[4]   Detection of Periprosthetic Infections With Use of Ribosomal RNA-Based Polymerase Chain Reaction [J].
Bergin, Patrick F. ;
Doppelt, Jason D. ;
Hamilton, William G. ;
Mirick, Gudrun E. ;
Jones, Angela E. ;
Sritulanondha, Supatra ;
Helm, Jeannine M. ;
Tuan, Rocky S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (03) :654-663
[5]  
Costerton W, 2003, J CLIN INVEST, V112, P1466, DOI 10.1172/JCI200320365
[6]  
Della Valle C, 2011, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V93A, P1355, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.9314ebo
[7]  
Della Valle C, 2010, J AM ACAD ORTHOP SUR, V18, P760
[8]   BACTERIAL-COLONIZATION OF ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES IN THE ABSENCE OF CLINICAL INFECTION [J].
DOBBINS, JJ ;
SELIGSON, D ;
RAFF, MJ .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1988, 158 (01) :203-205
[9]  
Gallo J, 2008, NEW MICROBIOL, V31, P97
[10]  
Gallo Jiri, 2004, Biomedical Papers (Olomouc), V148, P123, DOI 10.5507/bp.2004.022