Development and validation of a comprehensive patient-specific quality assurance program for a novel stereotactic radiation delivery system for breast lesions

被引:10
作者
Becker, Stewart J. [1 ]
Niu, Ying [2 ]
Mutaf, Yildirim [1 ]
Chen, Shifeng [1 ]
Poirier, Yannick [1 ]
Nichols, Elizabeth M. [1 ]
Yi, ByongYong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Washington, DC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 12期
关键词
breast; commissioning; patient specific quality assurance; stereotactic radiosurgery; FAILURE MODE; RADIOSURGERY; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12778
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The GammaPod is a dedicated prone breast stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) machine composed of 25 cobalt-60 sources which rotate around the breast to create highly conformal dose distributions for boosts, partial-breast irradiation, or neo-adjuvant SRS. We describe the development and validation of a patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) system for the GammaPod. Methods: We present two PSQA methods: measurement based and calculation based PSQA. The measurements are performed with a combination of absolute and relative dose measurements. Absolute dosimetry is performed in a single point using a 0.053-cc pinpoint ionization chamber in the center of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) breast phantom and a water-filled breast cup. Relative dose distributions are verified with EBT3 film in the PMMA phantom. The calculation-based method verifies point doses with a novel semi-empirical independent-calculation software. Results: The average (+/- standard deviation) breast and target sizes were 1263 +/- 335.3 cc and 66.9 +/- 29.9 cc, respectively. All ion chamber measurements performed in water and the PMMA phantom agreed with the treatment planning system (TPS) within 2.7%, with average (max) difference of -1.3% (-1.9%) and -1.3% (-2.7%), respectively. Relative dose distributions measured by film showed an average gamma pass rate of 97.0 +/- 3.2 when using a 3%/1 mm criteria. The lowest gamma analysis pass rate was 90.0%. The independent calculation software had average agreements (max) with the patient and QA plan calculation of 0.2% (2.2%) and -0.1% (2.0%), respectively. Conclusion: We successfully implemented the first GammaPod PSQA program. These results show that the GammaPod can be used to calculate and deliver the predicted dose precisely and accurately. For routine PSQA performed prior to treatments, the independent calculation is recommended as it verifies the accuracy of the planned dose without increasing the risk of losing vacuum due to prolonged waiting times.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 148
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] An algorithm for independent verification of Gamma Knife™ treatment plans
    Beck, J
    Berndt, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (10) : 2780 - 2784
  • [2] Commissioning and acceptance guide for the GammaPod
    Becker, Stewart
    Sabouri, Pouya
    Niu, Ying
    Prado, Karl
    Chen, Shifeng
    Nichols, Elizabeth
    Yi, ByongYong
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (20)
  • [3] Verification of source and collimator configuration for Gamma Knife® Perfexion™ using panoramic imaging
    Cho, Young-Bin
    van Prooijen, Monique
    Jaffray, David A.
    Islam, Mohammad K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (03) : 1325 - 1331
  • [4] Ciocca Mario, 2012, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, V82, pe305, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.010
  • [5] An FMEA evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy dose delivery failures at tolerance criteria levels
    Faught, Jacqueline Tonigan
    Balter, Peter A.
    Johnson, Jennifer L.
    Kry, Stephen F.
    Court, Laurence E.
    Stingo, Francesco C.
    Followill, David S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (11) : 5575 - 5583
  • [6] Fda, 2017, GAMMAPOD GCC 1202 CL
  • [7] EVALUATION OF SAFETY IN A RADIATION ONCOLOGY SETTING USING FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    Ford, Eric C.
    Gaudette, Ray
    Myers, Lee
    Vanderver, Bruce
    Engineer, Lilly
    Zellars, Richard
    Song, Danny Y.
    Wong, John
    DeWeese, Theodore L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 852 - 858
  • [8] Automated treatment planning for a dedicated multi-source intracranial radiosurgery treatment unit using projected gradient and grassfire algorithms
    Ghobadi, Kimia
    Ghaffari, Hamid R.
    Aleman, Dionne M.
    Jaffray, David A.
    Ruschin, Mark
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3134 - 3141
  • [9] Commissioning and performance evaluation of RadCalc for the Elekta unity MRI-linac
    Graves, Stephen A.
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    Boczkowski, Amanda
    St-Aubin, Joel
    Wang, Dongxu
    Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (12): : 54 - 62
  • [10] Dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy: Commissioning and verification of dose distributions
    Grebe, G
    Pfaender, M
    Roll, M
    Luedemann, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (05): : 1451 - 1460