Preoperative nomograms incorporating magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer

被引:90
作者
Shukla-Dave, Amita [1 ,2 ]
Hricak, Hedvig [2 ]
Akin, Oguz [2 ]
Yu, Changhong [4 ]
Zakian, Kristen L. [1 ,2 ]
Udo, Kazuma [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [3 ]
Eastham, James [3 ]
Kattan, Michael W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Saga Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, Saga 840, Japan
[6] Saga Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol & Microbiol, Saga 840, Japan
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; nomograms; prostate neoplasms; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOPSY; MEN; ADENOCARCINOMA; FRAGMENTATION; SUBMISSION; MANAGEMENT; FEATURES; UTILITY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10612.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To validate previously published nomograms for predicting insignificant prostate cancer (PCa) that incorporate clinical data, percentage of biopsy cores positive (%BC+) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or MRI/MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) results. We also designed new nomogram models incorporating magnetic resonance results and clinical data without detailed biopsy data. Nomograms for predicting insignificant PCa can help physicians counsel patients with clinically low-risk disease who are choosing between active surveillance and definitive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 181 low-risk PCa patients (clinical stage T1c-T2a, prostate-specific antigen level <10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score of 6) had MRI/MRSI before surgery. For MRI and MRI/MRSI, the probability of insignificant PCa was recorded prospectively and independently by two radiologists on a scale from 0 (definitely insignificant) to 3 (definitely significant PCa). Insignificant PCa was defined on surgical pathology. There were four models incorporating MRI or MRI/MRSI and clinical data with and without %BC+ that were compared with a base clinical model without %BC and a more comprehensive clinical model with %BC+. Prediction accuracy was assessed using areas under receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS At pathology, 27% of patients had insignificant PCa, and the Gleason score was upgraded in 56.4% of patients. For both readers, all magnetic resonance models performed significantly better than the base clinical model (P <= 0.05 for all) and similarly to the more comprehensive clinical model. CONCLUSIONS Existing models incorporating magnetic resonance data, clinical data and %BC+ for predicting the probability of insignificant PCa were validated. All MR-inclusive models performed significantly better than the base clinical model.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1322
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis
  • [2] Accuracy of biopsy Gleason scores from a large uropathology laboratory: Use of a diagnostic protocol to minimize observer variability
    Carlson, GD
    Calvanese, CB
    Kahane, H
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) : 525 - 529
  • [3] Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate
    Carter, HB
    Sauvageot, J
    Walsh, PC
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) : 2206 - 2209
  • [4] The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: Trends in clinical presentation and primary management
    Cooperberg, MR
    Lubeck, DP
    Meni, MV
    Mehta, SS
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (11) : 2141 - 2149
  • [5] Predicting clinical end points: Treatment nomograms in prostate cancer
    Di Blasio, CJ
    Rhee, AC
    Cho, D
    Scardino, PT
    Kattan, MW
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (05) : 567 - 586
  • [6] CORRELATION BETWEEN VISUAL CLUES, OBJECTIVE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, AND INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT IN PROSTATE-CANCER
    DILORETO, C
    FITZPATRICK, B
    UNDERHILL, S
    KIM, DH
    DYTCH, HE
    GALERADAVIDSON, H
    BIBBO, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1991, 96 (01) : 70 - 75
  • [7] Validation of pretreatment nomograms for predicting indolent prostate cancer:: Efficacy in contemporary urological practice
    Dong, Fei
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Schroeder, Fritz H.
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (01) : 150 - 154
  • [8] Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening:: Estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer
    Draisma, G
    Boer, R
    Otto, SJ
    van der Cruijsen, IW
    Damhuis, RAM
    Schröder, FH
    de Koning, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (12) : 868 - 878
  • [9] PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    CARMICHAEL, M
    BRENDLER, CB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05): : 368 - 374
  • [10] Utility of saturation biopsy to predict insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy
    Epstein, JI
    Sanderson, H
    Carter, HB
    Scharfstein, DO
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (02) : 356 - 360