Cooperative Management of Groundwater Resources in the Presence of Environmental Externalities

被引:35
作者
Esteban, Encarna [1 ]
Dinar, Ariel [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Def, Dept Business, Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Water Sci & Policy Ctr, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Cooperation; Non-cooperation; Externalities; Common-pool resources; Groundwater management; Ecosystem; Game theory; Shapley value; Nash-Harsanyi solution; Core; Public choice; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC VALUE; WATER; COST; AQUIFER; QUALITY; CONTAMINATION; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-012-9602-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how cooperation among users can achieve a better management of groundwater in the presence of environmental externalities. Cooperation allows users to internalize the damages caused by their activities and reduce extractions. The paper develops a game theoretical framework to assess the value of cooperation in an aquifer that is divided into three sub-aquifers that are being overly exploited. Two types of externalities are modeled: first, water extractions in each sub-aquifer impact water levels in neighboring sub-aquifers (extraction externality). Second, the three sub-aquifers are also connected to an ecosystem and thus decisions in each sub-aquifer affect the health of the ecosystem (environmental externality). A cooperative game theory model is applied. The model empirically shows how the uncontrolled extractions in each sub-aquifer affects neighboring groundwater users but also cause severe impacts to the linked ecosystem. The model is tested empirically in one of the most important aquifers in Spain, the Eastern la Mancha aquifer. The results illustrate how both extraction and environmental externalities interact in affecting the likelihood of cooperation among the users. The paper estimates the value of cooperation and its stability with and without the environmental externality.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 469
页数:27
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   NONPOINT AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION - PESTICIDE CONTAMINATION OF GROUNDWATER SUPPLIES [J].
ANDERSON, GD ;
OPALUCH, JJ ;
SULLIVAN, WM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 67 (05) :1238-1243
[2]  
[Anonymous], ESTUDIOS AGROSOCIALE
[3]   Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature [J].
Balmford, A ;
Bruner, A ;
Cooper, P ;
Costanza, R ;
Farber, S ;
Green, RE ;
Jenkins, M ;
Jefferiss, P ;
Jessamy, V ;
Madden, J ;
Munro, K ;
Myers, N ;
Naeem, S ;
Paavola, J ;
Rayment, M ;
Rosendo, S ;
Roughgarden, J ;
Trumper, K ;
Turner, RK .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) :950-953
[4]  
Barbier E.B., 1997, Economic Valuation of Wetlands. A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners
[5]   Valuing the environment as input: review of applications to mangrove-fishery linkages [J].
Barbier, EB .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 35 (01) :47-61
[7]   CONSISTENCY BETWEEN CONTINGENT VALUATION ESTIMATES - A COMPARISON OF 2 STUDIES OF UK NATIONAL-PARKS [J].
BATEMAN, I ;
WILLIS, K ;
GARROD, G .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 1994, 28 (05) :457-474
[8]   A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy [J].
Bendor, Todd .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2009, 89 (1-2) :17-27
[9]   The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature [J].
Brander, LM ;
Florax, RJGM ;
Vermaat, JE .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 33 (02) :223-250
[10]   A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies [J].
Brouwer, R. ;
Langford, I. H. ;
Bateman, I. J. ;
Turner, R. K. .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 1999, 1 (01) :47-57