Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Older People: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:116
作者
Gould, Rebecca L. [1 ]
Coulson, Mark C. [2 ]
Howard, Robert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Dept Old Age Psychiat, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] Middlesex Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Sci, Dept Psychol, London N17 8HR, England
关键词
cognitive behavioral therapy; depression; meta-analysis; older people; SELF-MANAGEMENT THERAPY; LATE-LIFE DEPRESSION; BIBLIOTHERAPY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; OUTPATIENTS; DISORDER; ADULTS; INTERVENTIONS; SYMPTOMS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04166.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives To review the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression in older people, together with factors associated with its efficacy. Design Online literature databases and registers were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CBT for depression in older people. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted. Setting Studies involving participants from the community and inpatient and outpatient clinical settings were included in the meta-analysis. Participants Older people with major or minor depression, dysthymia, or depressive symptoms. Measurements Evidence-based outcome measures of depression. Results Four hundred eighty-five studies were identified, of which 23 were included. At the end of the intervention, CBT was significantly more effective at reducing depressive symptoms (irrespective of whether rated by clinicians or participants) than treatment as usual (TAU) or being on a waiting list but not than active controls. The same pattern of results was found for 6-month follow-up. At all other time-points, pooled effect sizes in favor of CBT were nonsignificant. Clinician-rated outcome measures resulted in larger effect sizes in favor of CBT than self-rated measures. No significant differences in efficacy were found between CBT and other treatment (pharmacotherapy and other psychotherapies). Meta-regression analyses revealed four factors that predicted effect sizes for comparisons between CBT and control conditions, including whether concurrent pharmacotherapy was allowed. Conclusion CBT for depression in older people is more effective than waiting list or TAU, but greater efficacy than active controls or other treatment has not been demonstrated. More high-quality RCTs comparing CBT with active controls need to be conducted before firm conclusions can be drawn about the efficacy of CBT for depression in older people. Other treatment approaches that could be contrasted with or augment CBT (e.g., pharmacotherapy) also need to be explored further.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1830
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
ABRAHAM IL, 1992, NURS RES, V41, P196
[2]   A model for intervention research in late-life depression [J].
Alexopoulos, George S. ;
Bruce, Martha L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 24 (12) :1325-1334
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[5]  
[Anonymous], CLIN GUID NAT I HLTH
[6]  
[Anonymous], PRACT GUID TREATM PA
[7]   Treatment of depression in low-income older adults [J].
Areán, PA ;
Gum, A ;
McCulloch, CE ;
Bostrom, A ;
Gallagher-Thompson, D ;
Thompson, L .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2005, 20 (04) :601-609
[8]   Depression in the Italian community: epidemiology and socio-economic implications [J].
Battaglia, A ;
Dubini, A ;
Mannheimer, R ;
Pancheri, P .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 19 (03) :135-142
[9]  
Blazer DG, 2003, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V58, P249
[10]   Suicidal behavior in elders [J].
Conwell, Yeates ;
Thompson, Caitlin .
PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 31 (02) :333-+