共 55 条
On two novel types of three-way decisions in three-way decision spaces
被引:51
作者:
Hu, Bao Qing
[1
,3
]
Wong, Heung
[2
]
Yiu, Ka-fai Cedric
[2
]
机构:
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Appl Math, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Computat Sci Hubei Key Lab, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Partially ordered sets;
Fuzzy sets;
Interval-valued fuzzy sets;
Rough sets;
Three-way decision spaces;
Three-way decisions;
THEORETIC ROUGH SET;
ATTRIBUTE REDUCTION;
FUZZY;
MODEL;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ijar.2016.12.007
中图分类号:
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号:
081104 ;
0812 ;
0835 ;
1405 ;
摘要:
In order to explore a unified theory of three-way decisions proposed by Yao, Hu introduced three-way decision spaces through an axiomatic method, established the corresponding three-way decisions, and proposed two open problems on the changes of decision parameters in definition of three-way decisions. For answering these two questions, this paper firstly discusses the parameter changes in the assumptions from 0 <= beta < alpha <= 1 to 0 <= beta <= alpha <= 1 and inequality E(A)(x) <= beta in the rejection region is replaced by E(A)(x) < beta. Under the circumstance, this paper introduces new type of three-way decisions in three-way decision spaces and discusses properties of the three-way decisions, lower and upper approximations induced by three-way decisions, aggregation three-way decisions over multiple three-way decision spaces and dynamic three-way decisions on three-way decision spaces. Then this paper discusses another question on refusal decision region when the uncertain region is defined by using inequality beta < E(A)(x) < alpha and gives one example to illustrate the similarity and difference among these three-way decisions based on three-way decision spaces. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 306
页数:22
相关论文