Can H2S affect the methane oxidation in a landfill?

被引:16
作者
Long, Yu-Yang [1 ]
Liao, Yan [1 ,4 ]
Zhang, Kun [1 ]
Hu, Li-Fang [2 ]
Fang, Cheng-Ran [3 ]
Shen, Dong-Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Zhejiang Prov Key Lab Solid Waste Treatment & Rec, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Qual & Safety Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Mississippi Int Water China Co Ltd, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
H2S; Behavior; CH4; Oxidation; Landfill; HYDROGEN-SULFIDE; COVER SOIL; REDUCED SULFUR; WASTE; EMISSIONS; INHIBITION; GENERATION; MECHANISM; RESPONSES; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The effects of H2S on CH4 biological oxidation in landfill cover soil (LCS) and aged municipal solid waste (AMSW) at different CH4 concentrations were investigated. The CH4 biological oxidation rates of LCS and AMSW were found to be significantly affected by CH4 concentration, with maximum oxidized concentrations of 5% and 20% of CH4, respectively, occurring within 20 d. These differences may have been due to different dominant methanotroph populations. The CH4 oxidation of LCS and AMSW was significantly inhibited by H2S at low CH4 concentrations (5%), but not at high levels of CH4 (20% and 50%). One possible pathway of the effects of H2S on CH4 oxidation was competitive inhibition. These findings indicate that AMSW, which could adapt to the complex LFG environment more easily in comparison to LCS, was more suitable for use as a landfill cover for CH4 emission mitigation. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 444
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Kinetics of biological methane oxidation in the presence of non-methane organic compounds in landfill bio-covers
    Albanna, Muna
    Warith, Mostafa
    Fernandes, Leta
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (02) : 219 - 227
  • [2] Anderson R., 2010, MODELING HYDROGEN SU, P13
  • [3] [Anonymous], MUN DOM REF DET PH G
  • [4] Evaluation of a biologically active cover for mitigation of landfill gas emissions
    Barlaz, MA
    Green, RB
    Chanton, JP
    Goldsmith, CD
    Hater, GR
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 38 (18) : 4891 - 4899
  • [5] Inhibition of methane oxidation by volatile sulfur compounds (CH3SH and CS2) in landfill cover soils
    Börjesson, G
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2001, 19 (04) : 314 - 319
  • [6] Developments in odour control and waste gas treatment biotechnology: a review
    Burgess, JE
    Parsons, SA
    Stuetz, RM
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2001, 19 (01) : 35 - 63
  • [7] Ambient hydrogen sulfide, total reduced sulfur, and hospital visits for respiratory diseases in northeast Nebraska, 1998-2000
    Campagna, D
    Kathman, SJ
    Pierson, R
    Inserra, SG
    Phifer, BL
    Middleton, DC
    Zarus, GM
    White, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (02): : 180 - 187
  • [8] Land application of aerobic sewage sludge does not impair methane oxidation rates of soils
    Contin, Marco
    Goi, Daniele
    De Nobili, Maria
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 441 : 10 - 18
  • [9] The inhibition of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase by the gases carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulfide: chemical mechanism and physiological significance
    Cooper, Chris E.
    Brown, Guy C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOENERGETICS AND BIOMEMBRANES, 2008, 40 (05) : 533 - 539
  • [10] Induction of enhanced CH4 oxidation in soils:: NH4+ inhibition patterns
    De Visscher, A
    Van Cleemput, O
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2003, 35 (07) : 907 - 913