Double-blind randomized controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of two reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitors, pirlindole and moclobemide, in the treatment of depression

被引:18
作者
Tanghe, A
Geerts, S
VanDorpe, J
Brichard, B
Bruhwyler, J
Geczy, J
机构
[1] THERABEL RES SA, RES DEV & BIOSTAT, B-1180 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
[2] ACAD HOSP HEILIG HART, ASSE, BELGIUM
[3] GRP PRAKT PSYCHOTHERAPIE, BRUGGE, BELGIUM
[4] ACAD HOSP ST LUCAS, DEPT PSYCHIAT, ASSABROEK BRUGES, BELGIUM
关键词
major depression; antidepressant; monoamine oxidase inhibitor; pirlindole; moclobemide;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09918.x
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The aim of this double-blind randomized study was to compare the efficacy and the tolerability of moclobemide (300-600 mg daily) and pirlindole (150-300 mg daily), two reversible inhibitors of MAO-A (RIMAs), in the treatment of depression. In total 116 patients were included in the trial, 111 patients (52 patients on pirlindole and 59 patients on moclobemide) were evaluable for efficacy and safety, and 77 patients completed the whole study (42 days of administration). Both treatments produced highly significant improvements in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) score and the Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS) score from day 7 to day 42. The pattern of development of the three scores in the two groups did not differ significantly. After 42 days of treatment, an improvement of greater than or equal to 50% in the HDRS score was noted in 80% and 67% of patients in the pirlindole and moclobemide groups, respectively. A total of 30 (58%) patients on pirlindole and 33 (56%) patients on moclobemide experienced side-effects that were considered to be possibly or probably related to the medication. The differences between the two drugs were non-significant for all types of side-effect, with the exception of dry mouth and tachycardia, which were significantly more frequent with moclobemide.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] RIMA - A NEW CONCEPT IN THE TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION WITH MOCLOBEMIDE
    AMREIN, R
    HETZEL, W
    STABL, M
    SCHMIDBURGK, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 7 (3-4) : 123 - 132
  • [2] A COMPARISON OF MOCLOBEMIDE, AMITRIPTYLINE AND PLACEBO IN DEPRESSION - A CANADIAN MULTICENTER STUDY
    BAKISH, D
    BRADWEJN, J
    NAIR, N
    MCCLURE, J
    REMICK, R
    BULGER, L
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 106 : S98 - S101
  • [3] BLAHA L, 1983, PSYCHIAT STATE ART, V3, P303
  • [4] EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF MOCLOBEMIDE COMPARED WITH FLUVOXAMINE IN DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (DSM III) - A FRENCH SWISS DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    BOUGEROL, T
    UCHIDA, C
    GACHOUD, JP
    KOHLER, M
    MIKKELSEN, H
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 106 : S102 - S108
  • [5] A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF THE ANTIDEPRESSANT ACTIVITY OF MOCLOBEMIDE, A NEW MAO-A INHIBITOR
    CASACCHIA, M
    CAROLEI, A
    BARBA, C
    FRONTONI, M
    ROSSI, A
    MECO, G
    ZYLBERMAN, MR
    [J]. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 1984, 17 (04) : 122 - 125
  • [6] CHEN DT, 1993, CLIN NEUROPHARMACOL, V17, pS50
  • [7] CONVERSION OF THE NEUROTOXIC PRECURSOR 1-METHYL-4-PHENYL-1,2,5,6-TETRAHYDROPYRIDINE INTO ITS PYRIDINIUM METABOLITE BY HUMAN-PLATELET MONOAMINE-OXIDASE TYPE-B
    DAPRADA, M
    CESURA, AM
    KETTLER, R
    ZURCHER, G
    HAEFELY, WE
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1985, 57 (03) : 257 - 262
  • [8] DAVIS JM, 1985, COMPREHENSIVE TXB PS, V4, P1513
  • [9] DeWilde J, 1997, HUM PSYCHOPHARM CLIN, V12, P41, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(199701/02)12:1<41::AID-HUP829>3.3.CO
  • [10] 2-Z