Assessment of the OsteoMark-Navigation System for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

被引:11
作者
Peacock, Zachary S. [1 ]
Magill, John C. [2 ]
Tricomi, Brad J. [3 ,4 ]
Murphy, Brian A. [2 ]
Nikonovskiy, Vladimir [2 ]
Hata, Nobuhiko [5 ,6 ]
Chauvin, Laurent [6 ]
Troulis, Maria J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Phys Sci Inc, Andover, MA USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Surg Nav & Robot Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION; RECONSTRUCTION; EXPERIENCE; NEURONAVIGATION; ACCURACY; GUIDE; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of a novel navigation system for maxillofacial surgery using human cadavers and a live minipig model. Materials and Methods: We tested an electromagnetic tracking system (OsteoMark-Navigation) that uses simple sensors to determine the position and orientation of a hand-held pencil-like marking device. The device can translate 3-dimensional computed tomographic data intraoperatively to allow the surgeon to localize and draw a proposed osteotomy or the resection margins of a tumor on bone. The accuracy of the OsteoMark-Navigation system in locating and marking osteotomies and screw positions in human cadaver heads was assessed. In group 1 (n = 3, 6 sides), OsteoMark-Navigation marked osteotomies and screw positions were compared to virtual treatment plans. In group 2 (n = 3, 6 sides), marked osteotomies and screw positions for distraction osteogenesis devices were compared with those performed using fabricated guide stents. Three metrics were used to document the precision and accuracy. In group 3 (n = 1), the system was tested in a standard operating room environment. Results: For group 1, the mean error between the points was 0.7 mm (horizontal) and 1.7 mm (vertical). Compared with the posterior and inferior mandibular border, the mean error was 1.2 and 1.7 mm, respectively. For group 2, the mean discrepancy between the points marked using the OsteoMark-Navigation system and the surgical guideswas 1.9 mm (range 0 to 4.1). The system maintained accuracy on a live minipig in a standard operating room environment. Conclusion: Based on this research OsteoMark-Navigation is a potentially powerful tool for clinical use in maxillofacial surgery. It has accuracy and precision comparable to that of existing clinical applications. (C) 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2005 / 2016
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Virtual planning for craniomaxillofacial surgery-7 Years of experience
    Adolphs, Nicolai
    Haberl, Ernst-Johannes
    Liu, Weichen
    Keeve, Erwin
    Menneking, Horst
    Hoffmeister, Bodo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (05) : E289 - E295
  • [2] Frameless stereotaxy with scalp-applied fiducial markers for brain biopsy procedures: experience in 218 cases
    Barnett, GH
    Miller, DW
    Weisenberger, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 91 (04) : 569 - 576
  • [3] Computer Planning and Intraoperative Navigation for Palatomaxillary and Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibular Free Flaps
    Bell, R. Bryan
    Weimer, Katherine A.
    Dierks, Eric J.
    Buehler, Mark
    Lubek, Joshua E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (03) : 724 - 732
  • [4] Computer-Assisted Planning, Stereolithographic Modeling, and Intraoperative Navigation for Complex Orbital Reconstruction: A Descriptive Study in a Preliminary Cohort
    Bell, R. Bryan
    Markiewicz, Michael R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (12) : 2559 - 2570
  • [5] Birkfellner W., 2008, IMAGE GUIDED INTERVE, P23
  • [6] Osteomark: a surgical navigation system for oral and maxillofacial surgery
    Bouchard, C.
    Magill, J. C.
    Nikonovskiy, V.
    Byl, M.
    Murphy, B. A.
    Kaban, L. B.
    Troulis, M. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (02) : 265 - 270
  • [7] Computerized navigation for surgery of the lower jaw: Comparison of 2 navigation systems
    Casap, Nardy
    Wexler, Alon
    Eliashar, Ron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (07) : 1467 - 1475
  • [8] Clinical use of a neuronavigation system in hemangioblastoma resection of posterior cranial fossa
    Chen, Weiqiang
    Zhang, Guangyu
    Lin, Cai
    Yang, Yingming
    Cai, Danhui
    Huang, Mindong
    Xu, Yankai
    Cai, Chuwei
    Li, Wang'an
    Lin, Chonghui
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 21 (03) : 234 - 240
  • [9] Accuracy of Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy With a Stereolithographic Template
    Chen, Xia-Yun
    Chen, Song-Ling
    Zhang, Xing
    Li, Jian-Ping
    Deng, Wei
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 66 (01) : 88 - 91
  • [10] Comparison of two computer-assisted surgery techniques to guide a mandibular distraction osteogenesis procedure technical note
    d'Hauthuille, C
    Taha, F
    Devauchelle, B
    Testelin, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 34 (02) : 197 - 201