The potential of antiviral agents to control classical swine fever: A modelling study

被引:14
|
作者
Backer, Jantien A. [1 ]
Vrancken, Robert [2 ]
Neyts, Johan [2 ,3 ]
Goris, Nesya [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen UR, Cent Vet Inst, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[2] Okapi Sci NV, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Rega Inst Med Res, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Classical swine fever; Pestivirus; Antiviral; Stochastic simulation model; Control strategy; VIRUS; NETHERLANDS; PIGS; TRANSMISSION; VACCINATION; STRATEGIES; EPIDEMICS; MARKER;
D O I
10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.06.013
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Classical swine fever (CSF) represents a continuous threat to pig populations that are free of disease without vaccination. When CSF virus is introduced, the minimal control strategy imposed by the EU is often insufficient to mitigate the epidemic. Additional measures such as preemptive culling encounter ethical objections, whereas emergency vaccination leads to prolonged export restrictions. Antiviral agents, however, provide instantaneous protection without inducing an antibody response. The use of antiviral agents to contain CSF epidemics is studied with a model describing within- and between-herd virus transmission. Epidemics are simulated in a densely populated livestock area in The Netherlands, with farms of varying sizes and pig types (finishers, piglets and sows). Our results show that vaccination and/or antiviral treatment in a 2 km radius around an infected herd is more effective than preemptive culling in a 1 km radius. However, the instantaneous but temporary protection provided by antiviral treatment is slightly less effective than the delayed but long-lasting protection offered by vaccination. Therefore, the most effective control strategy is to vaccinate animals when allowed (finishers and piglets) and to treat with antiviral agents when vaccination is prohibited (sows). As independent control measure, antiviral treatment in a 1 km radius presents an elevated risk of epidemics running out of control. A 2 km control radius largely eliminates this risk. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Classical Swine Fever in Brazil: study for the survey of classical swine fever outbreaks in Brazil from 1978 to 2004
    Pereira Freitas, Tania Rosaria
    Esteves, Eduardo Goncalves
    Oliveira, Anapolino Macedo
    Gasino Joineau, Mara Elisa
    Souza Duarte, Ana Cristina
    Vargas, Ildara
    Caldas, Lucio Ayres
    Rebello, Moacyr Alcoforado
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2007, 28 (02): : 277 - 286
  • [32] General Review on Hog Cholera (Classical Swine Fever), African Swine Fever, and Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Infection
    Shinoda, Sumio
    Mizuno, Tamaki
    Miyoshi, Shin-ichi
    JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (08) : 1105 - 1114
  • [33] Time-dependent infection probability of classical swine fever via excretions and secretions
    Weesendorp, Eefke
    Loeffen, Willie
    Stegeman, Arjan
    de Vos, Clazien
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2011, 98 (2-3) : 152 - 164
  • [34] Control of African swine fever epidemics in industrialized swine populations
    Halasa, Tariq
    Botner, Anette
    Mortensen, Sten
    Christensen, Hanne
    Toft, Nils
    Boklund, Anette
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 197 : 142 - 150
  • [35] Classical swine fever: the European experience and a guide for infected areas
    Vandeputte, J
    Chappuis, G
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 1999, 18 (03): : 638 - 647
  • [36] Multicriteria Evaluation of Classical Swine Fever Control Strategies Using the Choquet Integral
    Brosig, J.
    Traulsen, I.
    Krieter, J.
    TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2016, 63 (01) : 68 - 78
  • [37] Preventive vaccination contributes to control classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa sp.)
    Rossi, S.
    Pol, F.
    Forot, B.
    Masse-provin, N.
    Rigaux, S.
    Bronner, A.
    Le Potier, M. -F.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 142 (1-2) : 99 - 107
  • [38] African swine fever and classical swine fever:: a review of the pathogenesis
    Gómez-Villamandos, JC
    Carrasco, L
    Bautista, MJ
    Sierra, MA
    Quezada, M
    Hervas, J
    De Lara, FCM
    Ruiz-Villamor, E
    Salguero, FJ
    Sónchez-Cordón, PJ
    Romanini, S
    Núñez, A
    Mekonen, T
    Méndez, A
    Jover, A
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2003, 110 (04): : 165 - 169
  • [39] Spatial seroprevalence of classical swine fever in India
    Patil, Sharanagouda S.
    Suresh, Kuralayanapalya Puttahonnappa
    Hemadri, Divakar
    Hiremath, Jagadish
    Sridevi, Rajangam
    Krishnamoorthy, Paramanadham
    Bhatia, Sandeep
    Roy, Parimal
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2021, 53 (03)
  • [40] Classical swine fever - an update
    Paton, DJ
    Greiser-Wilke, I
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2003, 75 (03) : 169 - 178