Preoccupied minds feel less control: Sense of agency is modulated by cognitive load

被引:45
作者
Hon, Nicholas [1 ]
Poh, Jia-Hou [2 ]
Soon, Chun-Siong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Psychol, Singapore 117570, Singapore
[2] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Multimodal Neuroimaging Neuropsychiat Disorders L, Singapore 169857, Singapore
[3] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Cognit Neurosci Lab, Singapore 169857, Singapore
关键词
Agency; Cognitive load; APPARENT MENTAL CAUSATION; EXPERIENCE; JUDGMENT; INFORMATION; CONTIGUITY; PREDICTION; CAUSALITY; ATTENTION; INFERENCE; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People have little difficulty distinguishing effects they cause and those they do not. An important question is what underlies this sense of agency. A prevailing idea is that the sense of agency arises from a comparison between a predictive representation of the effect (of a given action) and the actual effect that occurs, with a clear match between the two producing a strong sense of agency. Although there is general agreement on this comparison process, one important theoretical issue that has yet to be fully determined is whether these computations are consciously performed. Here, we studied this issue by requiring participants to perform a simple judgment of agency task under conditions of different concurrent working memory load. Working memory operations are known to tax conscious cognitive resources. We found that agency judgments were moderated by working memory load, with lower agency ratings being observed in the high load condition, suggesting that the sense of agency is dependent on the availability of conscious cognitive resources. An examination of the time-course of this load effect suggests that it is the construction of the mental representation of the predicted effect which is particularly dependent on said resources. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 561
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control [J].
Linser, Katrin ;
Goschke, Thomas .
COGNITION, 2007, 104 (03) :459-475
[12]  
Michotte A., 1963, PERCEPTION CAUSALITY
[13]   Awareness of action: Inference and prediction [J].
Moore, James ;
Haggard, Patrick .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2008, 17 (01) :136-144
[14]   Feelings of control: Contingency determines experience of action [J].
Moore, James W. ;
Lagnado, David ;
Deal, Darvany C. ;
Haggard, Patrick .
COGNITION, 2009, 110 (02) :279-283
[15]   Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence [J].
Pronin, Emily ;
Wegner, Daniel M. ;
McCarthy, Kimberly ;
Rodriguez, Sylvia .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (02) :218-231
[16]   Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership [J].
Sato, A ;
Yasuda, A .
COGNITION, 2005, 94 (03) :241-255
[17]   Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency [J].
Sato, Atsushi .
COGNITION, 2009, 110 (01) :74-83
[18]   Probability judgments of agency: Rational or irrational? [J].
Schmidt, Thomas ;
Heumueller, Vera C. .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2010, 19 (01) :1-11
[19]   CONTROLLED AND AUTOMATIC HUMAN INFORMATION-PROCESSING .1. DETECTION, SEARCH, AND ATTENTION [J].
SCHNEIDER, W ;
SHIFFRIN, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (01) :1-66
[20]  
SHANKS DR, 1989, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-B, V41, P139