Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: External validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries

被引:96
作者
Lingsma, Hester [1 ]
Andriessen, Teuntje M. J. C. [3 ]
Haitsema, Iain [2 ]
Horn, Janneke [4 ]
van der Naalt, Joukje [5 ]
Franschman, Gaby [6 ]
Maas, Andrew I. R. [7 ]
Vos, Pieter E. [3 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Ctr Med Decis Making, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Ctr Med Decis Making, Dept Neurosurg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Traumatic brain injury; trauma; prognosis; prognostic model; validation; HEAD-INJURY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d602e
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Several prognostic models to predict outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been developed, but few are externally validated. We aimed to validate the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) prognostic models in a recent unselected patient cohort and to assess the additional prognostic value of extracranial injury. METHODS: The Prospective Observational COhort Neurotrauma (POCON) registry contains 508 patients with moderate or severe TBI, who were admitted in 2008 and 2009 to five trauma centers in the Netherlands. We predicted the probability of mortality and unfavorable outcome at 6 months after injury with the IMPACT prognostic models. We studied discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) and calibration. We added the extracranial component of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) to the models and calculated the increase in AUC. RESULTS: The IMPACT models had an adequate discrimination in the POCON registry, with AUCs in the external validation between 0.85 and 0.90 for mortality and between 0.82 and 0.87 for unfavorable outcome. Observed outcomes agreed well with predicted outcomes. Adding extracranial injury slightly improved predictions in the overall population (unfavorable outcome: AUC increase of 0.002, p = 0.02; mortality: AUC increase of 0.000, p = 0.37) but more clearly in patients with moderate TBI (unfavorable outcome: AUC increase of 0.008, p < 0.01, mortality: AUC increase of 0.012, p = 0.02) and patients with minor computed tomographic result abnormalities (unfavorable outcome: AUC increase of 0.013, p < 0.01; mortality: AUC increase of 0.001, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The IMPACT models performed well in a recent series of TBI patients. We found some additional impact of extracranial injury on outcome, specifically in patients with less severe TBI or minor computed tomographic result abnormalities. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74: 639-646. Copyright (C) 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 646
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Epidemiology, Severity Classification, and Outcome of Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Multicenter Study [J].
Andriessen, Teuntje M. J. C. ;
Horn, Janneke ;
Franschman, Gaby ;
van der Naalt, Joukje ;
Haitsma, Iain ;
Jacobs, Bram ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Vos, Pieter E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2011, 28 (10) :2019-2031
[2]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[3]   Traumatic brain injury [J].
Ghajar, J .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9233) :923-929
[4]   Outcome after acute extradural haematoma, influence of additional injuries and neurological complications in the ICU [J].
Heinzelmann, M ;
Platz, A ;
Imhof, HG .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1996, 27 (05) :345-349
[5]   Outcome Prediction in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Age and Clinical Variables Are Stronger Predictors than CT Abnormalities [J].
Jacobs, Bram ;
Beems, Tjemme ;
Stulemeijer, Maja ;
van Vugt, Arie B. ;
van der Vliet, Ton M. ;
Borm, George F. ;
Vos, Pieter E. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2010, 27 (04) :655-668
[6]   Head Injury and Outcome-What Influence do Concomitant Injuries Have? [J].
Lefering, Rolf ;
Paffrath, Thomas ;
Linker, Ralph ;
Bouillon, Bertil ;
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 65 (05) :1036-1044
[7]   Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions [J].
Lingsma, Hester F. ;
Roozenbeek, Bob ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Murray, Gordon D. ;
Maas, Andrew I. R. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2010, 9 (05) :543-554
[8]   Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults [J].
Maas, Andrew I. R. ;
Stocchetti, Nino ;
Bullock, Ross .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2008, 7 (08) :728-741
[9]   Statistical approaches to the univariate prognostic analysis of the IMPACT database on traumatic brain injury [J].
McHugh, Gillian S. ;
Butcher, Isabella ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Lu, Juan ;
Mushkudiani, Nino ;
Marmarou, Anthony ;
Maas, Andrew I. R. ;
Murray, Gordon D. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2007, 24 (02) :251-258
[10]   A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes [J].
Mushkudiani, Nino A. ;
Hukkelhoven, Chantal W. P. M. ;
Hernandez, Adrian V. ;
Murray, Gordon D. ;
Choi, Sung C. ;
Maas, Andrew I. R. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (04) :331-343