International dosage differences in fluoxetine clinical trials

被引:7
作者
Patten, S
Cipriani, A
Brambilla, P
Nosè, M
Barbui, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Osped Policlin, Sect Psychiat, Dept Med & Publ Hlth, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychiat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Udine, Dept Pathol & Expt & Clin Med, Sect Psychiat, I-33100 Udine, Italy
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE | 2005年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
fluoxetine; clinical trials; metaanalysis; dosages; depression;
D O I
10.1177/070674370505000107
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: International differences are thought to exist in dosages used by clinicians treating mood disorders. This study examined international dosage differences in antidepressant clinical trials, using a database formed and maintained as a component of a Cochrane review of comparative clinical trials of fluoxetine. Methods: This systematic review included 132 studies. A detailed set of methodological features and results were abstracted from the original publications and entered into an electronic database. Mean and maximum fluoxetine dosages were compared across countries. To evaluate the dosages of comparison medications, a defined daily dosage (DDD) ratio was calculated as the trial mean dosage divided by the DDD for that drug. Results: Both the maximum and mean dosages for fluoxetine and comparison medications were higher in trials conducted in the US (fluoxetine weighted mean dosage 49.18 mg; 95%CI, 41.30 to 57.05), compared with trials conducted in Europe (fluoxetine weighted mean dosage 29.98 mg; 95%CI, 25.28 to 34.68). Since most clinical trials were conducted in Europe or the US, we could not determine whether different dosages tended to be used in other regions. Conclusions: International differences in prescriber behaviour may influence, and in turn be influenced by, the conduct of clinical trials. It is difficult to reconcile such differences with the principles of evidence-based medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]   DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SERTRALINE VERSUS FLUOXETINE IN MAJOR DEPRESSION [J].
AGUGLIA, E ;
CASACCHIA, M ;
CASSANO, GB ;
FARAVELLI, C ;
FERRARI, G ;
GIORDANO, P ;
PANCHERI, P ;
RAVIZZA, L ;
TRABUCCHI, M ;
BOLINO, F ;
SCARPATO, A ;
BERARDI, D ;
PROVENZANO, G ;
BRUGNOLI, R ;
ROZZINI, R .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 8 (03) :197-202
[2]  
Alby J M., 1993, Ann Psychiatry, V8, P136
[3]  
ALTAMURA AC, 1989, INT J CLIN PHARM RES, V9, P391
[4]   Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability [J].
Anderson, IM .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2000, 58 (01) :19-36
[5]   Reboxetine, a new noradrenaline selective antidepressant, is at least as effective as fluoxetine in the treatment of depression [J].
Andreoli, V ;
Caillard, V ;
Deo, RS ;
Rybakowski, JK ;
Versiani, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 22 (04) :393-399
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1988, INT CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V3, P75
[7]  
[Anonymous], BR J CLIN RES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1992, N TRENDS EXP CLIN PS
[9]  
[Anonymous], PRIMARY CARE PSYCHIA
[10]  
[Anonymous], BRIT J CLIN RES