Remote surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery: an effective alternative to standard clinic-based follow-up

被引:29
作者
Siddika, A. [1 ]
Tolia-Shah, D. [1 ]
Pearson, T. E. [1 ]
Richardson, N. G. B. [1 ]
Ross, A. H. McL. [1 ]
机构
[1] Broomfield Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Chelmsford CM1 7ET, Essex, England
关键词
Colorectal cancer; follow up; distance surveillance; survival; LUNG-CANCER; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/codi.12970
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Most colorectal cancer recurrences are asymptomatic and are detected through routine postoperative clinic surveillance programmes with associated investigations. However, attendance at these clinics has a financial cost and may be associated with an increase in patient anxiety and dissatisfaction. The results of a remote follow-up system developed for selected patients are reported. Method A remote surveillance programme has been in place in our institution for over 9 years. Patients having elective and emergency treatment for colorectal cancer were enrolled. The timeliness of the investigation, detection of local recurrence and distant metastases and overall 5-year survival rates were determined. A cost review and patient satisfaction survey were performed. Results The programme was suitable for over 900 patients who had received surgery for colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2012, representing some 50% of the total number of patients treated in this period. Of these, 811 (90%) had investigations carried out on time. Five-year survival rates were comparable with national data. Cost-minimization analysis demonstrated a financial saving of 63% and a 75% reduction in clinic appointments. High levels of overall patient satisfaction (97%) were noted with the programme. Conclusion A remote surveillance system after colorectal cancer surgery is a safe and cost-effective alternative to traditional clinic-based follow up and has high patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 875
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Donnelly J, 2001, INT J CLIN PRACT, V55, P431
[2]   Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Jeffery, M. ;
Hickey, B. E. ;
Hider, P. N. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (01)
[3]   Developing and piloting a nurse-led model of follow-up in the multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer [J].
Knowles, Gillian ;
Sherwood, Linda ;
Dunlop, Malcom G. ;
Dean, Gail ;
Jodrell, Duncan ;
McLean, Catriona ;
Preston, Elizabeth .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2007, 11 (03) :212-223
[4]  
Koinberg I-L, 2004, Eur J Oncol Nurs, V8, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.ejon.2003.12.005
[5]   A health economic evaluation of follow-up after breast cancer surgery: Results of an rct study [J].
Koinberg, Ingalill ;
Engholm, G. -B. ;
Genell, A. ;
Holmberg, L. .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2009, 48 (01) :99-104
[6]   Nurse led follow up and conventional medical follow up in management of patients with lung cancer: randomised trial [J].
Moore, S ;
Corner, J ;
Haviland, J ;
Wells, M ;
Salmon, E ;
Normand, C ;
Brada, M ;
O'Brien, M ;
Smith, I .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7373) :1145-1147
[7]   Nurse specialist led follow-up in lung cancer: The experience of developing and delivering a new model of care [J].
Moore, Sally ;
Wells, Mary ;
Plant, Hilary ;
Fuller, Frances ;
Wright, Majella ;
Corner, Jessica .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2006, 10 (05) :364-377
[8]  
Renehan A., 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V324, P1
[9]  
Rojas MP., 2009, The Cochrane Library
[10]   Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: Quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up [J].
Stiggelbout, AM ;
deHaes, JCJM ;
Vree, R ;
vandeVelde, CJH ;
Bruijninckx, CMA ;
vanGroningen, K ;
Kievit, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (06) :914-920