Effects of a mutual recovery intervention on mental health in depressed elderly community-dwelling adults: a pilot study

被引:0
作者
Wang, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Hua, Yujie [1 ,3 ]
Fu, Hua [1 ]
Cheng, Longfeng [4 ]
Qian, Wen [1 ]
Liu, Junyang [1 ]
Crawford, Paul [5 ,6 ]
Dai, Junming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Hlth Commun Inst, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Occupat Hlth & Poison Control, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Suzhou Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Nottingham, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Physiotherapy, Nottingham, England
[6] Univ Nottingham, Inst Mental Hlth, Nottingham, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 英国艺术与人文研究理事会;
关键词
Mental health; Depression; Well-being; Intervention; Elderly population; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY; LATE-LIFE; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; DISORDERS; SYMPTOMS; DIAGNOSIS; ALLIANCE; EXERCISE; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-016-3930-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The prevalence of depression in the elderly is growing worldwide, and the population aging in China makes depression a major health problem for the elderly adults and a tremendous burden to the society. Effective interventions should be determined to provide an approach solving the problem and improving the situation. This study examined the effectiveness of a mutual recovery program intervention on depressive symptom, sleep quality, and well-being in community-dwelling elderly adults with depressive symptom in Shanghai. Methods: Recruitment was performed between July 2012 and August 2012. Using a cluster randomized wait-list controlled design, we randomized 6 communities (n = 237) into either the intervention group (3 communities, n = 105) or to a wait-list control group (3 communities, n = 132). All participants met the inclusion criteria for depression, which were defined by The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). From March to May of 2013, participants in the intervention group underwent a 2-month mutual recovery program intervention. The intervention included seven 90-min, weekly sessions that were based on a standardized self-designed schedule. Depression was used as primary outcome at three measurement moments: baseline (T1), before intervention at 24 weeks (T2), and immediately after intervention at 32 weeks (T3). Well-being and sleep quality were used as the secondary outcomes, and were evaluated based on the WHO-5 Well-being Index (WHO-5) and the Self-administered Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ). Finally, a total of 225 participants who completed all the sessions and the three measurements entered the final analysis. Mixed-model repeated measures ANOVAs were performed to estimate the intervention effects. Results: There was no significant difference in gender, marriage, age structure, post-work type, and education background between the intervention and control group at baseline. Multivariate ANOVAs showed that there was no significant difference within the groups in terms of sleep, well-being, and depression at baseline and before the intervention. Mixed-model repeated measures ANOVAs detected a group x time interaction on depression, sleep, and well-being and showed a favorable intervention effect within groups immediately after the intervention. Conclusions: The mutual recovery program could be a creative and effective approach to improve mental health in older community-dwelling adults with depressive symptom.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The WHO (Ten) well-being index: Validation in diabetes [J].
Bech, P ;
Gudex, C ;
Johansen, KS .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1996, 65 (04) :183-190
[2]   Trends in service use and treatment for mental disorders in adults throughout Great Britain [J].
Brugha, TS ;
Bebbington, PE ;
Singleton, N ;
Melzer, D ;
Jenkins, R ;
Lewis, G ;
Farrell, M ;
Bhugra, D ;
Lee, A ;
Meltzer, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 185 :378-384
[3]   Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine [J].
Campbell, M. J. ;
Donner, A. ;
Klar, N. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) :2-19
[4]   Depression and bipolar support alliance consensus statement on the unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders in late life [J].
Charney, DS ;
Reynolds, CF ;
Lewis, L ;
Lebowitz, BD ;
Sunderland, T ;
Alexopoulos, GS ;
Blazer, DG ;
Katz, IR ;
Meyers, BS ;
Arean, PA ;
Borson, S ;
Brown, C ;
Bruce, ML ;
Callahan, CM ;
Charlson, ME ;
Conwell, Y ;
Cuthbert, BN ;
Devanand, DP ;
Gibson, MJ ;
Gottlieb, GL ;
Krishnan, KR ;
Laden, SK ;
Lyketsos, CG ;
Mulsant, BH ;
Niederehe, G ;
Olin, JT ;
Oslin, DW ;
Pearson, J ;
Persky, T ;
Pollock, BG ;
Raetzman, S ;
Reynolds, M ;
Salzman, C ;
Schulz, R ;
Schwenk, TL ;
Scolnick, E ;
Unützer, J ;
Weissman, MM ;
Young, RC .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 60 (07) :664-672
[5]  
Chen L. X., 2006, MARKET DEMOGRAPHIC A, V12, P63
[6]   Planning a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Methodological Issues [J].
Christie, Janice ;
O'Halloran, Peter ;
Stevenson, Mike .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2009, 58 (02) :128-134
[7]   Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles [J].
Clark, Andrew E. ;
Frijters, Paul ;
Shields, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2008, 46 (01) :95-144
[8]   Creative practice as mutual recovery in mental health [J].
Crawford, Paul ;
Lewis, Lydia ;
Brown, Brian ;
Manning, Nick .
MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2013, 18 (02) :55-+
[9]   Health humanities: the future of medical humanities? [J].
Crawford, Paul ;
Brown, Brian ;
Tischler, Victoria ;
Baker, Charley .
MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2010, 15 (03) :4-+
[10]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191