Rose replant disease: detailed analyses of plant reactions, root endophytes and rhizosphere microbial communities

被引:3
作者
Baumann, A. [1 ]
Yim, B. [1 ,2 ]
Grunewaldt-Stoecker, G. [1 ]
Liu, B. [3 ]
Beerhues, L. [3 ]
Sapp, M. [4 ]
Nesmes, J. [5 ]
Sorensen, S. J. [5 ]
Smalla, K. [2 ]
Winkelmann, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Hort Prod Syst, Hannover, Germany
[2] Julius Kuhn Inst JKI, Inst Epidemiol & Pathogen Diagnost, Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Pharmaceut Biol, Braunschweig, Germany
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ, Inst Populat Genet, Cluster Excellence Plant Sci CEPLAS, Dusseldorf, Germany
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biol, Sect Microbiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
XXVI INTERNATIONAL EUCARPIA SYMPOSIUM SECTION ORNAMENTALS: EDITING NOVELTY | 2020年 / 1283卷
关键词
amplicon sequencing; bio-test; endophytes; replant problems; Rosa; secondary metabolites; soil sickness; BACTERIAL ENDOPHYTES; APPLE; DIAGNOSIS; INDUCTION; ARD;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1283.14
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Garden rose production involves field culture for rootstock production and cultivation of grafted plants. When roses are replanted at the same site, reduced growth, stunting and discoloration of roots are observed. This phenomenon is well-known as rose replant disease ( RRD), which results in considerable economic losses. Until now, the causes of RRD are largely unknown and measures to overcome RRD are lacking. In contrast to apple, research on replant disease in roses is scarce. In this study, we have carried out a greenhouse pot experiment, using either untreated or gamma irradiated RRD soils from two sites. Slow release fertilizer was added to the soils before planting seedlings of the rootstock Rosa corymbifera 'Laxa'. After eight weeks, shoot and root growth were recorded, roots were examined by detailed microscopic analyses and secondary metabolites were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rhizosphere samples were taken and their respective microbial communities were analyzed by amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria and archaea as well as the ITS2 and cox2 region for fungi and oomycetes, respectively. Finally, segments of surface-disinfected roots were placed on 523 medium and outgrowing endophytic bacteria were isolated and identified. For both soils, significantly higher shoot and root biomass were observed for plants growing in irradiated compared to untreated soils. Roots were darkened, deformed and finally damaged in their outer cell layers when growing in untreated RRD soil. This corresponded to higher concentrations of two catechin derivatives and gallic acid in roots in this RRD soil compared to roots in the irradiated variants. Twenty-six endophytic bacterial isolates were obtained from roots that were affiliated to 15 different bacterial genera. Rhizosphere microbial community compositions not only differed significantly between soils of the two sites, but also between treatments (untreated versus gamma irradiated) for bacteria, fungi and oomycetes. The identification of genera differing in relative abundance in the different soils and treatments will provide a deeper insight in causal agents of RRD as well as antagonists or beneficials. Future analyses should include different rootstock species in order to identify RRD tolerant germplasm.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] ALTSCHUL SF, 1990, J MOL BIOL, V215, P403, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999
  • [2] Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases:: Principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects
    Compant, S
    Duffy, B
    Nowak, J
    Clément, C
    Barka, EA
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (09) : 4951 - 4959
  • [3] Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: Their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization
    Compant, Stephane
    Clement, Christophe
    Sessitsch, Angela
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 42 (05) : 669 - 678
  • [4] de Mendiburu F., 2019, PACKAGE AGRICOLAE R
  • [5] Dressler H., 1973, DISSERTATION
  • [6] Rhizosphere bacteria and fungi associated with plant growth in soils of three replanted apple orchards
    Franke-Whittle, Ingrid H.
    Manici, Luisa M.
    Insam, Heribert
    Stres, Blaz
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 2015, 395 (1-2) : 317 - 333
  • [7] Diagnosis of apple replant disease (ARD): Microscopic evidence of early symptoms in fine roots of different apple rootstock genotypes
    Grunewaldt-Stoecker, G.
    Mahnkopp, F.
    Popp, C.
    Maiss, E.
    Winkelmann, T.
    [J]. SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2019, 243 : 583 - 594
  • [8] The Hidden World within Plants: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations for Defining Functioning of Microbial Endophytes
    Hardoim, Pablo R.
    van Overbeek, Leonard S.
    Berg, Gabriele
    Pirttila, Anna Maria
    Compant, Stephane
    Campisano, Andrea
    Doering, Matthias
    Sessitsch, Angela
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2015, 79 (03) : 293 - 320
  • [9] KOKUBUN T, 1994, Z NATURFORSCH C, V49, P628
  • [10] Root growth, function and rhizosphere microbiome analyses show local rather than systemic effects in apple plant response to replant disease soil
    Lucas, Maik
    Balbin-Suarez, Alicia
    Smalla, Kornelia
    Vetterlein, Doris
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):