Clarifying values: an updated review

被引:178
作者
Fagerlin, Angela [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pignone, Michael [4 ]
Abhyankar, Purva [5 ]
Col, Nananda [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Feldman-Stewart, Deb [9 ]
Gavaruzzi, Teresa [10 ,11 ]
Kryworuchko, Jennifer [12 ]
Levin, Carrie A. [13 ]
Pieterse, Arwen H. [14 ]
Reyna, Valerie [15 ,16 ]
Stiggelbout, Anne [14 ]
Scherer, Laura D. [17 ]
Wills, Celia [18 ]
Witteman, Holly O. [19 ,20 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Bioeth & Social Sci Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] VA Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Dept Med & Cecil Sheps, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Univ Stirling, Nursing Midwifery & Allied Hlth Profess Res Unit, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[6] Univ New England, Coll Osteopath Med, Dept Family Med, Biddeford, ME 04005 USA
[7] Univ New England, Coll Osteopath Med, Dept Geriatr Med, Biddeford, ME 04005 USA
[8] Univ New England, Ctr Excellence Neurosci, Biddeford, ME 04005 USA
[9] Queens Univ, Canc Res Inst, Dept Oncol, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[10] Univ Padua, Dept Dev Psychol & Socializat, I-835131 Padua, Italy
[11] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds LS2 9LJ, W Yorkshire, England
[12] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Nursing, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W3, Canada
[13] Informed Med Decis Fdn, Boston, MA 02108 USA
[14] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Decis Making, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
[15] Cornell Univ, Ctr Behav Econ & Decis Res, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[16] Cornell Univ, Cornell Magnet Resonance Imaging Facil, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[17] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, Columbia, MO USA
[18] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[19] Univ Laval, Off Educ & Continuing Profess Dev, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[20] Univ Laval, Dept Family & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; QUALITY; CLARIFICATION; INTUITION; THINKING; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Consensus guidelines have recommended that decision aids include a process for helping patients clarify their values. We sought to examine the theoretical and empirical evidence related to the use of values clarification methods in patient decision aids. Methods: Building on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration's 2005 review of values clarification methods in decision aids, we convened a multi-disciplinary expert group to examine key definitions, decision-making process theories, and empirical evidence about the effects of values clarification methods in decision aids. To summarize the current state of theory and evidence about the role of values clarification methods in decision aids, we undertook a process of evidence review and summary. Results: Values clarification methods (VCMs) are best defined as methods to help patients think about the desirability of options or attributes of options within a specific decision context, in order to identify which option he/she prefers. Several decision making process theories were identified that can inform the design of values clarification methods, but no single "best" practice for how such methods should be constructed was determined. Our evidence review found that existing VCMs were used for a variety of different decisions, rarely referenced underlying theory for their design, but generally were well described in regard to their development process. Listing the pros and cons of a decision was the most common method used. The 13 trials that compared decision support with or without VCMs reached mixed results: some found that VCMs improved some decision-making processes, while others found no effect. Conclusions: Values clarification methods may improve decision-making processes and potentially more distal outcomes. However, the small number of evaluations of VCMs and, where evaluations exist, the heterogeneity in outcome measures makes it difficult to determine their overall effectiveness or the specific characteristics that increase effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: Do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions? [J].
Bekker, Hilary L. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (03) :357-364
[2]   Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making: Extensive Thinking Without Effort [J].
Betsch, Tilmann ;
Gloeckner, Andreas .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2010, 21 (04) :279-294
[3]   Combining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support [J].
de Vries, Marieke ;
Fagerlin, Angela ;
Witteman, Holly O. ;
Scherer, Laura D. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 91 (02) :154-160
[4]   Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies [J].
Durand, Marie-Anne ;
Stiel, Mareike ;
Boivin, Jacky ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 71 (01) :125-135
[5]   Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Volk, Robert ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Barrat, Alexandra ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Barry, Michael ;
Mulley, Albert G. ;
Sepucha, Karen ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Clarke, Aileen ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Ruland, Cornelia ;
Sykes, Alan ;
Whelan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565) :417-419
[6]   Patient-focussed decision-making in early-stage prostate cancer: insights from a cognitively based decision aid [J].
Feldman-Stewart, D ;
Brundage, MD ;
Van Manen, L ;
Svenson, O .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2004, 7 (02) :126-141
[7]   VALUE ELICITATION - IS THERE ANYTHING IN THERE [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (08) :835-847
[8]   Decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Fraenkel, Liana ;
Peters, Ellen ;
Charpentier, Peter ;
Olsen, Blair ;
Errante, Lanette ;
Schoen, Robert T. ;
Reyna, Valerie .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (07) :977-985
[9]  
Llewellyn-Thomas H., 2009, Shared Decision-Making in Health Care, V1st, P123
[10]   Decision Support for Patients: Values Clarification and Preference Elicitation [J].
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary A. ;
Crump, R. Trafford .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2013, 70 :50S-79S