Subareolar and peritumoral injection identify similar sentinel nodes for breast cancer

被引:50
作者
Bauer, TW
Spitz, FR
Callans, LS
Alavi, A
Mick, R
Weinstein, SP
Bedrosian, I
Fraker, DL
Bauer, TL
Czerniecki, BJ
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] York Hosp, Dept Surg, York, PA USA
关键词
sentinel lymph node mapping; subareolar injection; blue dye; radioisotope; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1245/aso.2002.9.2.169
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping with radioisotope and blue dye is rapidly becoming the standard of care for breast cancer. The optimal location for injection of radioisotope and blue dye is still being investigated. The goal of this study was to determine whether blue dye injection into the subareolar (SA) location localized the same sentinel nodes as the peritumoral (PT) location for patients with breast cancer. Methods: Three hundred thirty-two patients with biopsy-proven operable breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ at two institutions underwent SLN mapping. Eighty-three patients had PT injection of blue dye (group 1), and 249 patients had SA injection of blue dye (group 2). All patients underwent PT injection of Tc-99m-labeled sulfur colloid. Results: The two groups were similar in age, previous biopsy type, and tumor size, location, and histology. The mean number of SLNs identified was 2.4 (range, 0-9) in group 1 and 2.5 (range, 0-11) in group 2. The SLN identification rate was 95% for group 1 and 97% for group 2. The isotope success rate was 94% for both groups. The blue dye success rate was 84% for group 1 and 90% for group 2. The isotope/blue dye concordance rate was 87% for group 1 and 90% for group 2. At a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 14 to 40), there were no axillary recurrences in any of the 332 patients. Conclusions: These data suggest that delivery of mapping reagents in the SA and PT locations identifies similar lymph nodes. Because of simplicity and the similarity in node identification between SA and PT injection, further investigation of the SA site for delivery of SLN mapping reagents for breast cancer is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 176
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer
    Albertini, JJ
    Lyman, GH
    Cox, C
    Yeatman, T
    Balducci, L
    Ku, NN
    Shivers, S
    Berman, C
    Wells, K
    Rapaport, D
    Shons, A
    Horton, J
    Greenberg, H
    Nicosia, S
    Clark, R
    Cantor, A
    Reintgen, DS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (22): : 1818 - 1822
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1985, JAMA, V254, P3461
  • [3] Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer
    Barnwell, JM
    Arredondo, MA
    Kollmorgen, D
    Gibbs, JF
    Lamonica, D
    Carson, W
    Zhang, P
    Winston, J
    Edge, SB
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 5 (02) : 126 - 130
  • [4] The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
    Bass, SS
    Cox, CE
    Ku, NN
    Berman, C
    Reintgen, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (02) : 183 - 194
  • [5] Bedrosian I, 1999, J NUCL MED, V40, P1143
  • [6] Bedrosian I, 2000, CANCER, V88, P2540, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000601)88:11<2540::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-A
  • [8] Beller F., 1990, FEMALE BREAST ITS DI, P1
  • [9] Intradermal isotope injection: A highly accurate method of lymphatic mapping in breast carcinoma
    Boolbol, SK
    Fey, JV
    Borgen, PI
    Heerdt, AS
    Montgomery, LL
    Paglia, M
    Petrek, JA
    Cody, HS
    Van Zee, KJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [10] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection
    Borgstein, P
    Pijpers, R
    Comans, EF
    van Diest, PJ
    Boom, RP
    Meijer, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (03) : 275 - 283