Conversion of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67 and Prognosis in breast cancer metastases to the brain

被引:6
|
作者
Jiaxin, Chen [1 ]
Jinmei, Zhou [2 ]
Huiqiang, Zhang [2 ]
Xuexue, Wu [2 ]
Xiaobo, Wang [2 ]
Shaohua, Zhang [2 ]
Yanhong, Tai [2 ]
Zefei, Jiang [2 ]
Tao, Wang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fifth Med Ctr Chinese PLA Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, Chinese PLA Med Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Fifth Med Ctr Chinese PLA Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Med Univ, Hefei, Peoples R China
[4] Southern Med Univ, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
breast cancer; brain metastases; ER; PR; HER-2; FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; IMPACT; DISCORDANCE; BIOMARKERS; CARCINOMA; PROFILES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2022.1002173
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aimed to analyze the expression levels of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), and Ki-67 proliferation index in the brain metastatic lesions and primary lesions in Chinese patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) and determine the correlation between their changes and patients' survival. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on patients with BCBM. The clinical characteristic of these patients was collected. The differences in the expression levels of the ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67 index between the primary lesions and brain lesions were evaluated, and the association between the differences and survival was analyzed. ResultsThe conversion rate of anyone receptor (ER, PR, or HER2) between the primary lesions and brain metastatic lesions was 45.0% (18/40), of which the ER inconsistency rate was 25.0%, the PR inconsistency rate was 22.5%, and the HER-2 inconsistency rate was 15.0%, and the receptor conversion resulted in a subtype conversion of 27.5% (11/40). The patients with HER-2 expression discordance between the primary lesions and the brain metastatic lesions had significantly longer survival times (58.9 vs. 26.4 months, P = 0.04) after diagnosis of brain metastases. ConclusionIn this study, 45.0% of breast cancer patients developed biomarker-conversion between the primary lesions and brain metastatic lesions, and the differences in the expression levels of the ER, PR, and HER-2, the change in Ki-67 index between the primary lesions and brain lesions may predict patients' survival.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of changes in biologic markers ER, PR, HER 2 and Ki-67 index in breast cancer with administration of neoadjuvant dose dense doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel chemotherary
    Dede, D. S.
    Gumuskaya, B.
    Guler, G.
    Onat, D.
    Altundag, K.
    Ozisik, Y.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2013, 18 (02): : 366 - 371
  • [22] Her2 negative luminal breast carcinoma and Ki-67 evaluation
    Pavlakis, Kitty
    Vrekoussis, Thomas
    Tsipoura, Anna
    Tsenga, Artemis
    Arapantoni-Dadioti, Petroula
    Gavresea, Theofani
    Messini, Irini
    Barbounis, Vassilis
    BREAST, 2012, 21 (04) : 529 - 533
  • [23] Genistein and enterolactone in relation to Ki-67 expression and HER2 status in postmenopausal breast cancer patients
    Jaskulski, Stefanie
    Jung, Audrey Y.
    Rudolph, Anja
    Johnson, Theron
    Thoene, Kathrin
    Herpel, Esther
    Sinn, Peter
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH, 2017, 61 (11)
  • [24] Discordances in ER, PR, and HER2 between primary breast cancer and brain metastasis
    Jaehag Jung
    Seung Hoon Lee
    Mira Park
    Ji Hye Youn
    Sang Hoon Shin
    Ho Shin Gwak
    Heon Yoo
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2018, 137 : 295 - 302
  • [25] HER2 Receptor Conversion Is a strong Survival Predictor in Patients with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases
    Michel, Anna
    Oppong, Marvin Darkwah
    Rauschenbach, Laurel
    Pierscianek, Daniela
    Dinger, Thiemo F.
    Schmidt, Teresa
    Hense, Joerg
    Poettgen, Christoph
    Kimmig, Rainer
    Ahmadipour, Yahya
    Oezkan, Neriman
    Mueller, Oliver
    Junker, Andreas
    Sure, Ulrich
    Jabbarli, Ramazan
    El Hindy, Nicolai
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : E332 - E343
  • [26] Evaluation of ER, PR and HER2 markers by flow cytometry for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis
    Wopereis, Sandro
    Walter, Laura Otto
    Couto Vieira, Daniella Serafin
    Biasi Ribeiro, Amanda Abdalla
    Fernandes, Braulio Leal
    Wilkens, Renato Salerno
    Santos-Silva, Maria Claudia
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2021, 523 : 504 - 512
  • [27] Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Chia, Stephen K.
    Voduc, David
    Gao, Dongxia
    Leung, Samuel
    Snider, Jacqueline
    Watson, Mark
    Davies, Sherri
    Bernard, Philip S.
    Parker, Joel S.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (10): : 736 - 750
  • [28] Efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic breast cancer by discordance of HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer
    Van Raemdonck, Elisa
    Floris, G.
    Berteloot, P.
    Laenen, A.
    Vergote, I.
    Wildiers, H.
    Punie, K.
    Neven, P.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 185 (01) : 183 - 194
  • [29] Comparison of immunohistochemistry with PCR for assessment of ER, PR, and Ki-67 and prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer
    Sinn, Hans-Peter
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Keller, Marius
    Schlombs, Kornelia
    Laible, Mark
    Seitz, Julia
    Lakis, Sotirios
    Veltrup, Elke
    Altevogt, Peter
    Eidt, Sebastian
    Wirtz, Ralph M.
    Marme, Frederik
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [30] The Expression Patterns of ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6, EGFR, Ki-67 and AR by Immunohistochemical Analysis in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
    Subik, Kristina
    Lee, Jin-Feng
    Baxter, Laurie
    Strzepek, Tamera
    Costello, Dawn
    Crowley, Patti
    Xing, Lianping
    Hung, Mien-Chie
    Bonfiglio, Thomas
    Hicks, David G.
    Tang, Ping
    BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 4 : 35 - 41