Electoral goals and center-state transfers: A theoretical model and empirical evidence from India

被引:400
作者
Arulampalam, Wiji [1 ]
Dasgupta, Sugato [2 ]
Dhillon, Amrita [1 ]
Dutta, Bhaskar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Econ, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Ctr Econ Studies & Planning, New Delhi 110067, India
关键词
Redistributive politics; Alignment; Swing; Electoral competition; REDISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS; ELECTION GOALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.01.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We construct a model of redistributive politics where the central government is opportunistic and uses its discretion to make transfers to state governments on the basis of political considerations. These considerations are the alignment between the incumbent parties at the central and state levels and whether a state is a swing state or not. A testable prediction from the model is that a state that is both swing and aligned with the central government is especially likely to receive higher transfers. We test this prediction using Indian data for 14 states from 1974-75 to 1996-97. We find that a state which is both aligned and swing in the last state election is estimated to receive 16% higher transfers than a state which is unaligned and non-swing. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 119
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INDIA DECIDES ELECTI
[2]  
BISWAS R, 2000, POLITICAL LOBB UNPUB
[3]   Election goals and income redistribution: Recent evidence from Albania [J].
Case, A .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 45 (03) :405-423
[4]  
Chakraborty P., 2003, UNEQUAL FISCAL UNPUB
[5]   ELECTORAL-POLITICS AS A REDISTRIBUTIVE GAME [J].
COX, GW ;
MCCUBBINS, MD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1986, 48 (02) :370-389
[6]  
DASGUPTA S, 2000, ELECTORAL GOAL UNPUB
[7]   The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics [J].
Dixit, A ;
Londregan, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1996, 58 (04) :1132-1155
[8]   Fiscal federalism and redistributive politics [J].
Dixit, A ;
Londregan, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1998, 68 (02) :153-180
[9]  
GHOSH S, 2006, CONT ISSUES IDEAS SO, V2, P1
[10]  
*GOV IND MIN PLANN, 1974, STAT ABSTR IND