Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation

被引:98
作者
Li, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Jianbin [1 ]
Cheng, Huicai [3 ]
Wang, Wei [2 ]
Dong, Renjie [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Key Lab Clean Renewable Energy Utilizat Technol, Coll Engn, Minist Agr, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Dept Environm Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Heibei Acad Sci, Inst Biol, Shijiazhuang 050081, Peoples R China
关键词
Hydrothermal pretreatment; Two-phase anaerobic digestion; Municipal solid waste; Fermentation type; Microbial community structure; Energy balance; THERMAL PRETREATMENT; METHANE PRODUCTION; CO-DIGESTION; KITCHEN WASTE; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; BIOMETHANE YIELD; HYDROLYSIS RATE; LOADING RATE; FOOD WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.101
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The viability of hydrothermal pretreatment (HTP) to improve the efficiency of biogas production from municipal solid wastes (MSWs) is uncertain because there is always a trade-off between organic matters hydrolysis and recalcitrant melanoidins formation when applying HTP on different solid wastes. In this study, MSWs including waste activated sludge, fruit and vegetable residues, and kitchen wastes, with and without HTP were digested in the one phase and two-phase anaerobic digesters, respectively. Although the specific biogas production of MSWs in two-phase anaerobic digestion was significantly enhanced by HTP, no benefit could be found in one-phase anaerobic digestion because of the melanoidins formation. The specific biogas production of hydrothermally pretreated MSWs was much higher in two-phase anaerobic digestion (0.71 L biogas/g VSadded) than that of MSWs in one-phase anaerobic digestion with or without HTP (0.53 L and 0.55 L biogasig VSadded) when the butyric acid type fermentation dominated in the acidogenic phase. These findings indicated that the recalcitrant melanoidins formed in the HTP process were probably removed in the acidogenic digester. Differing from previous study, mixed-acid type fermentation, rather than ethanol type fermentation, was observed in the acidogenic digester fed with hydrothermally pretreated feedstock when pH was adjusted in the range of 4.0-4.5 with high oxidation reduction potential values of 49-97 my. The succeeding specific biogas production of mixed-acid type feedstock was only 0.59 L biogas/g VSadded, which was lower than that of the butyric acid type feedstock. Microbial community structure was independent of the pH valties and was substrate-specific in the acidogenic digesters. In the acidogenic digester with the HTP substrate, the phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes increased, thereby possibly resulting from the increased content of soluble sugar and proteins in the HTP feedstock. Energy balance estimation of the four defined scenarios indicated that the combined HTP and two-phase AD in the MSWs treatment can achieve higher net energy output by 50.5-97.4% compared to the other three scenarios. This enables the combined process of HTP and two-phase AD to be a promising alternative way in the treatment of feedstock rich in protein and sugar. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 622
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Biogas residues as fertilisers - Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities [J].
Abubaker, J. ;
Risberg, K. ;
Pell, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 99 :126-134
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[3]   Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste [J].
Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan ;
Panico, Antonio ;
Esposito, Giovanni ;
Pirozzi, Francesco ;
Lens, Piet N. L. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 123 :143-156
[4]   Biohydrogen and Biogas - An overview on feedstocks and enhancement process [J].
Bharathiraja, B. ;
Sudharsanaa, T. ;
Bharghavi, A. ;
Jayamuthunagai, J. ;
Praveenkumar, R. .
FUEL, 2016, 185 :810-828
[5]   Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review [J].
Campuzano, Rosalinda ;
Gonzalez-Martinez, Simon .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 54 :3-12
[6]   Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: A review [J].
Cano, R. ;
Perez-Elvira, S. I. ;
Fdz-Polanco, F. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 149 :176-185
[7]   The effects of substrate pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion systems: A review [J].
Carlsson, My ;
Lagerkvist, Anders ;
Morgan-Sagastume, Fernando .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (09) :1634-1650
[8]   Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: A review [J].
Carrere, H. ;
Dumas, C. ;
Battimelli, A. ;
Batstone, D. J. ;
Delgenes, J. P. ;
Steyer, J. P. ;
Ferrer, I. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 183 (1-3) :1-15
[9]   Review of feedstock pretreatment strategies for improved anaerobic digestion: From lab-scale research to full-scale application [J].
Carrere, Helene ;
Antonopoulou, Georgia ;
Affes, Rim ;
Passos, Fabiana ;
Battimelli, Audrey ;
Lyberatos, Gerasimos ;
Ferrer, Ivet .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 199 :386-397
[10]   Pretreatment methods to improve anaerobic biodegradability of organic municipal solid waste fractions [J].
Cesaro, Alessandra ;
Belgiorno, Vincenzo .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 240 :24-37