Using fMRI to Constrain Theories of Cognition

被引:19
作者
White, Corey N. [1 ]
Poldrack, Russell A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Imaging Res Ctr, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Neurobiol, Imaging Res Ctr, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
fMRI; model comparison; DUAL-PROCESS MODELS; SIGNAL-DETECTION; RECOGNITION MEMORY; REINSTATEMENT; RECOLLECTION; MIND;
D O I
10.1177/1745691612469029
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research on cognition often leads to debates that are centered on how many processes exist and how they interact to guide behavior. These debates occur across a range of domains and are often difficult to resolve with behavioral data because similar behavioral predictions can be made by models with different core assumptions. Such model mimicry limits researchers' ability to find differential support for one type of model over the other using behavioral data alone. We argue that functional neuroimaging can help overcome this problem by providing additional dependent measures to constrain model testing. Recent advances in analysis, like multivariate approaches, expand the amount and type of data available for model testing. We illustrate the benefits of this approach by highlighting imaging results that directly speak to the debate over the nature of recollection processes in memory. These results show how functional neuroimaging can advance studies of cognition by providing richer data sets for contrasting cognitive models.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 83
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: Complexity, mimicry, and discriminability [J].
Cohen, Andrew L. ;
Rotello, Caren M. ;
MacMillan, Neil A. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2008, 15 (05) :906-926
[2]   A mini-review of fMRI studies of human medial temporal lobe activity associated with recognition memory [J].
Henson, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION B-COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (3-4) :340-360
[3]   What has (neuro)psychology told us about the mind (so far)? A reply to Coltheart (2006) [J].
Henson, Richard .
CORTEX, 2006, 42 (03) :387-392
[4]   A Dual-Stage Two-Phase Model of Selective Attention [J].
Huebner, Ronald ;
Steinhauser, Marco ;
Lehle, Carola .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 117 (03) :759-784
[5]   The diagnosticity of individual data for model selection: Comparing signal-detection models of recognition memory [J].
Jang, Yoonhee ;
Wixted, John T. ;
Huber, David E. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2011, 18 (04) :751-757
[6]   Recollection and the reinstatement of encoding-related cortical activity [J].
Johnson, Jeffrey D. ;
Rugg, Michael D. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2007, 17 (11) :2507-2515
[7]   Recollection, Familiarity, and Cortical Reinstatement: A Multivoxel Pattern Analysis [J].
Johnson, Jeffrey D. ;
McDuff, Susan G. R. ;
Rugg, Michael D. ;
Norman, Kenneth A. .
NEURON, 2009, 63 (05) :697-708
[8]   Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience [J].
Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus ;
Mur, Marieke ;
Bandettini, Peter .
FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 2
[9]   Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data [J].
Norman, Kenneth A. ;
Polyn, Sean M. ;
Detre, Greg J. ;
Haxby, James V. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (09) :424-430
[10]   Category learning and the memory systems debate [J].
Poldrack, Russell A. ;
Foerde, Karin .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2008, 32 (02) :197-205