Robotic Level III Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: Initial Series

被引:96
作者
Gill, Inderbir S.
Metcalfe, Charles
Abreu, Andre
Duddalwar, Vinay
Chopra, Sameer
Cunningham, Mark
Thangathurai, Duraiyah
Ukimura, Osamu
Satkunasivam, Raj
Hung, Andrew
Papalia, Rocco
Aron, Monish
Desai, Mihir
Gallucci, Michele
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Inst Urol, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Inst Urol, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Inst Urol, Dept Anesthesia, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, USC Inst Urol, Dept Cardiac Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[5] Regena Elena Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
关键词
vena cava; inferior; robotics; thrombectomy; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE; THROMBUS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.119
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for renal cancer is one of the most challenging open urologic oncology surgeries. We present the initial series of completely intracorporeal robotic level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy. Materials and Methods: Nine patients underwent robotic level III inferior vena cava thrombectomy and 7 patients underwent level II thrombectomy. The entire operation (high intrahepatic inferior vena cava control, caval exclusion, tumor thrombectomy, inferior vena cava repair, radical nephrectomy, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy) was performed exclusively robotically. To minimize the chances of intraoperative inferior vena cava thrombus embolization, an "inferior vena cava-first, kidney-last" robotic technique was developed. Data were accrued prospectively. Results: All 16 robotic procedures were successful, without open conversion or mortality. For level III cases (9), median primary kidney (right 6, left 3) cancer size was 8.5 cm (range 5.3 to 10.8) and inferior vena cava thrombus length was 5.7 cm (range 4 to 7). Median operative time was 4.9 hours (range 4.5 to 6.3), estimated blood loss was 375 cc (range 200 to 7,000) and hospital stay was 4.5 days. All surgical margins were negative. There were no intraoperative complications and 1 postoperative complication (Clavien 3b). At a median 7 months of followup (range 1 to 18) all patients are alive. Compared to level II thrombi the level III cohort trended toward greater inferior vena cava thrombus length (3.3 vs 5.7 cm), operative time (4.5 vs 4.9 hours) and blood loss (290 vs 375 cc). Conclusions: With appropriate patient selection, surgical planning and robotic experience, completely intracorporeal robotic level III inferior vena cava thrombectomy is feasible and can be performed efficiently. Larger experience, longer followup and comparison with open surgery are needed to confirm these initial outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 936
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgery of inferior vena cava-associated urological tumor lesions
    Weber, M.
    Meyer, F.
    Liehr, U. B.
    Halloul, Z.
    UROLOGE, 2013, 52 (10): : 1438 - 1446
  • [32] Robotic Level III IVC Tumor Thrombectomy: Duplicating the Open Approach
    Ramirez, Daniel
    Maurice, Matthew J.
    Cohen, Benjamin
    Krishnamurthi, Venkatesh
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    UROLOGY, 2016, 90 : 204 - 207
  • [33] Clinical Outcomes Related to the Level of Clamping in Inferior Vena Cava Surgery
    Jun, Heungman
    Han, Youngjin
    Park, Hojong
    Shin, Sung
    Cho, Yong-Pil
    Kwon, Tae-Won
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 39 (05) : 1294 - 1300
  • [34] Robotic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Are We Entering the House Through an Attic Window?
    Masic, Selma
    Kutikov, Alexander
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (05): : 641 - 642
  • [35] Review of Robotic-Assisted Radical Nephrectomy with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Prunty, Megan
    Bell, Spencer
    Kutikov, Alexander
    Bukavina, Laura
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2022, 23 (12) : 363 - 370
  • [36] Effect of utilization of veno-venous bypass vs. cardiopulmonary bypass on complications for high level inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy and concomitant radical nephrectomy
    Simon, Ross M.
    Kim, Timothy
    Espiritu, Patrick
    Kurian, Tony
    Sexton, Wade J.
    Pow-Sang, Julio M.
    Sverrisson, Einar
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2015, 41 (05): : 911 - 919
  • [37] Robot-Assisted Hepatic Mobilization And Control Of Suprahepatic Infradiaphragmatic Inferior Vena Cava For Level 3 Vena Caval Thrombectomy: An IDEAL Stage 0 Study
    Sood, Akshay
    Jeong, Wooju
    Barod, Ravi
    Bahnson, Eamonn
    Kirura, Parfait
    Abdollah, Firas
    Bhandari, Mahendra
    Bahnson, Robert
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (07) : 741 - 745
  • [38] Robot-assisted Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: First or Second Porta Hepatis as an Important Boundary Landmark
    Wang, Baojun
    Li, Hongzhao
    Huang, Qingbo
    Liu, Kan
    Fan, Yang
    Peng, Cheng
    Gu, Liangyou
    Li, Xintao
    Guo, Gang
    Liu, Rong
    Hu, Minggen
    Zhao, Guodong
    Wang, Hongguang
    Liu, Fengyong
    Xiong, Jiang
    Zhang, Xu
    Ma, Xin
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (04) : 512 - 520
  • [39] En bloc laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy: A single-institution experience
    Tohi, Yoichiro
    Makita, Noriyuki
    Suzuki, Issei
    Suzuki, Ryosuke
    Kubota, Masashi
    Sugino, Yoshio
    Inoue, Koji
    Kawakita, Mutsushi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (03) : 363 - 368
  • [40] Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Different Sides Require Different Techniques
    Wang, Baojun
    Li, Hongzhao
    Ma, Xin
    Zhang, Xu
    Gu, Liangyou
    Li, Xintao
    Fan, Yang
    Gao, Yu
    Liu, Kan
    Zhu, Jie
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (06) : 1112 - 1119