Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis

被引:169
作者
Stamps, AE [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Environm Qual, San Francisco, CA 94101 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article is a quantitative literature review on the correlations between preference and mystery, complexity, legibility, or coherence for three classifications of environments: all, natural and built. A literature search located 61 articles covering 12,452 participants and 3125 scenes. Data suitable for a quantitative review were found in 28 of those articles, covering a total of 6288 participants and 1820 scenes. There was a considerable degree of heterogeneity in the data for all environments, for natural environments, and for built environments, indicating that results have not been reproducible. Studies using expert panels to rate coherence, legibility and complexity produced smaller results than did experiments using the same population of respondents for preference and the other variables. Implications for planning future work efficiently are discussed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
ANDERSON E, 1978, EXPERIENCE NATURE PS, P217
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENV DESIGN RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], SCI ENG ETHICS
[4]  
[Anonymous], SCI ENG ETHICS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1985, LANDSCAPE J, DOI DOI 10.3368/LJ.4.2.87
[6]  
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[7]  
Batchelor B. G., 1979, IEE Journal on Computers and Digital Techniques, V2, P157, DOI 10.1049/ij-cdt.1979.0031
[8]  
Browner R.D., 1982, DURABILITY BUILD MAT, V1, P113
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[10]  
Cooper H., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, V1st